Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Lagrangian of $\phi^4$ theory

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
2308 views

How do you derive the Lagrangian for a real scalar field ($\phi^4$ theory)?  I need to do so for spontaneous symmetry breaking. 

This question was asked by user34039 on Physics Stack Exchange but is now deleted there and has been restored from an archive.  

asked Mar 18, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by user34039 (5 points) [ revision history ]
edited Apr 30, 2014 by dimension10

What do you mean by derive? Do you mean to ask what it's physical interpretation is, and/or why someone would want to study it? - joshphysics  

No, I mean to derive it from first principles. - user34039

Which first principles? The way this business works is that either you (1) find a system and then determine if it can be well-described by a field theory you care about or (2) you say "let's consider this field theory" and then see if there is a system whose dynamics are governed by it, or perhaps a hybrid of the two. Which of these are you looking for in this context? FYI I'm not the downvoter. - joshphysics    

hybrid of the two - user34039

I suspect that what you mean is that you have a $Z_2$ symmetric theory $\mathcal{L} = -\frac12 (\partial\phi)^2+\frac12\mu^2\phi^2-\lambda\phi^4 $ and you would like to compute the Lagrangian appropriate for fluctuations about the phase where the $Z_2$ is spontaneously broken. You would want to write $\phi(x,t)=\bar\Phi + \varphi(x,t) $ where $\bar\Phi$ is the minimum of the potential $V\left(\phi\right) = - \frac12\mu^2\phi^2 +\lambda\phi^4  $. You can then plug this decomposition into $\mathcal L$, and keep all the terms that depend on $\varphi$. It's just algebra. - Andrew 

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

I suspect that what you mean is that you have a $Z_2$ symmetric theory $\mathcal{L} = -\frac12 (\partial\phi)^2+\frac12\mu^2\phi^2-\lambda\phi^4 $ and you would like to compute the Lagrangian appropriate for fluctuations about the phase where the $Z_2$ is spontaneously broken. You would want to write $\phi(x,t)=\bar\Phi + \varphi(x,t) $ where $\bar\Phi$ is the minimum of the potential $V\left(\phi\right) = - \frac12\mu^2\phi^2 +\lambda\phi^4  $. You can then plug this decomposition into $\mathcal L$, and keep all the terms that depend on $\varphi$. It's just algebra.  

answered Mar 18, 2014 by Andrew (135 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 23, 2014 by dimension10

This answer actually did not exist in the original PSE question, however, Andrew's comment was basically an answer, so I converted it. 

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$low
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...