Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

(propose a free ad)

I’m trying to understand the assumptions under which Goldstone theorem is valid. Is it just a Lagrangian that depends on scalar fields and has no gauge potentials? Or is it also true for more general Lagrangians?

Given a Lagragian $L$ which contains no gauge bosons and which is invariant under the group $G$ but the ground state is only invariant under the subgroup $H$, then there exists dim G- dim H Goldstone bosons (massless and spinless).

You also need Lorentz invariance. Check this out https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.0457.pdf

It also doesn't have to be spinless. Its quantum numbers are the same as the conserved charge it is spontaneously breaking. One well known example with spin is Goldstinos.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required