• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,728 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Derive non-linear $\sigma$ model from a theory of SU(2) matirx

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

It's said in Chapter VI.4 of A. Zee's book Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell, a theory defined as $L(U(x))=\frac{f^2}{4}Tr(\partial_{\mu}U^{\dagger}\cdot\partial^{\mu}U)$, can be write in the form of a non-linear $\sigma$ model (up to some order)


where $U(x)=e^{\frac{i}{f}\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau}}$ is a matrix-valued field belonging to $SU(2)$, $\vec{\pi}$ is a three components vector, $\vec{\tau}$ are Pauli matrices. Maybe it's not hard but I meet some problems to derive it.

I suppose the first step is the Taylor expansion of $U$, $U=1+\frac{i}{f}\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau}-\frac{1}{2f^2}(\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau})^2+...$, and then $\partial^{\mu}U=\frac{i}{f}\partial^{\mu}(\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau})-\frac{1}{f^2}(\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau})\partial^{\mu}(\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau})$, then


Now there are my questions,

(1) Can I write $\partial^{\mu}(\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau})=\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau}$? Then by $\vec{\tau}^2=1$, I get


which is almost correct but differ to the wished answer by a pre-factor $\frac{1}{2}$.

(2) Suppose $\partial^{\mu}(\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau})=\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau}$ is correct, however, if I do $\partial^{\mu}U=\frac{i}{f}U\partial^{\mu}(\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau})=\frac{i}{f}U\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau}$ first, it seems $\partial^{\mu}U^{\dagger}\cdot\partial^{\mu}U=|\frac{i}{f}U\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau}|^2=\frac{1}{f^2}(\partial\vec{\pi})^2$, say, only the first term of the wished answer.

I probably made something wrong somewhere, can anyone hit me?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 05:58 (UCT), posted by SE-user hongchaniyi
asked Nov 21, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by hongchaniyi (15 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Mar 17, 2014
I think you are somehow imagining a wrong question. There is nothing called "the" non-linear sigma model. You can define "a" non-linear sigma model by choosing whetever you like as the target Lie group in which your fields are valued in. Depending on what group you choose you get a different sigma-model. So you can always talk of the SU(2) NLSM where the fields are basically restricted to be on S^3. I would recommend that you see chapter 13, 14, 15 of this book to get a good picture of the issue, amazon.com/Quantum-Critical-Phenomena-International-Monographs/…

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 05:59 (UCT), posted by SE-user user6818
Hm, google chrome is trying to tell me that the revisions for this question are in "Greek". Huh?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 05:59 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dimensio1n0

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

First of all, the Pauli matrices are not space-time dependent, so of course you can pass the derivative right through them. Second of all, $\operatorname{Tr} [\partial(\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{\tau})]^2 = \operatorname{Tr}\partial_\mu \pi^i \partial^\mu \pi^j \tau^i \tau^j $

Now remember $\tau^i \tau^j = i \epsilon_{ijk} \tau^k + \delta^{ij} I_{2x2}$

So compute the trace and be done already!

(It pays to write things out in full if you aren't sure what you are doing)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 05:59 (UCT), posted by SE-user lionelbrits
answered Nov 21, 2013 by lionelbrits (110 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights