# I need help in understanding what was imported for a question

+ 0 like - 2 dislike
80 views

Could someone please verify that my interpretation of what was imported for this question is correct?

1. Although originally posted on Physics Stack Exchange, the question was re-posted here by the OP who is a registered user, and so there's no need to attribute the post to PSE.

2. The second comment by Lubos Motl is unattributed to PSE because Lubos commented here directly.

I'm confused :/

asked Apr 8, 2014 in Support
recategorized Apr 9, 2014

You are not confused, you just don't want others to be confused. Honesty, now, honesty.

@ron when I wrote the question, I was honestly confused. The question didn't have any attribution attached to it, attribution of imports was automatic via a plug-in, and so the question couldn't be an import. I was sure about this at the time, yet Lubos was commenting here!

Ok, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt (although it makes no difference what I think). Sorry.

@physicsnewbie No, Lubos was not commenting here (yet), they were restored from an archive, as mentioned.

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Incorrect. The user did not post it here, it was imported.

Lubos posted the comments on SE, but the comments were deleted, and are restored from an archive, so we are not obliged to attribute SE.

answered Apr 9, 2014 by (1,955 points)

physicsnewbie is pointing out that the attribution is missing on the import, you should add it on. It is not clear that one is not obliged to credit SE when importing deleted comments from an archive, there is no edit history to point to.

@physicsnewbie: You didn't really think that. You just want to make sure others don't think that. I do, only because it's opposite day. It serves PSE right for deleting Lubos's comments.

@physicsnewbie I have added the "Deleted comment" mention in a separate comment.

You couldn't possibly have read the comments and missed that everything about that question was imported. But if you were honest, I should apologize (you weren't). The answer to the grudge question is "yes", but it doesn't make any difference what I think.

@physicsnewbie: It's fine as it is, there is no chance of confusion.

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.