Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,846 answers , 20,597 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Reference for geometry in heterotic string compactifications

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
26 views

I'm looking for a good reference - including articles, reviews, talks, even blog posts - that go into the gory details of the compactification of the $E_8 \times E_8$ heterotic string on a Calabi-Yau.

Specifically, a text which describes the relation between the vector bundle $V$ (whose structure group $H$ breaks one of the $E_8$ factors into the maximal subgroup $G \times H$) and the supposed "$E_8$ bundle" that should exist in 10 dimensions. None of this is particularly clear in the second volumes of Green-Schwarz-Witten or Polchinski, which don't really go beyond the standard embedding where $V=TX$, the tangent bundle to the Calabi-Yau.

My understanding is that one constructs the bundle $V$ and identifies various portions of the fibers of the $E_8$ bundle with copies of $V$, $V^*$, $V\otimes V^*$ etc. But I don't really see this description in the literature, so I'm not sure this is correct. And it's not clear where the four dimensional picture arises out of this either.

Is there any more detailed reference regarding these issues around?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-10-27 21:09 (UTC), posted by SE-user nonreligious
asked Oct 24 in Theoretical Physics by nonreligious (10 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Oct 27

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsO$\varnothing$erflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...