Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

146 submissions , 123 unreviewed
3,961 questions , 1,408 unanswered
4,889 answers , 20,762 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
507 active unimported users
More ...

ADE Gauge Theory and String Theory

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
146 views

I should preface this my saying that I'm an algebraic geometer, and am not terribly knowledgeable about physics, nor the physics literature.

I want to consider the singular surfaces $\mathbb{C}^{2}/\Gamma$ where $\Gamma$ is a finite ADE type subgroup of $SU(2)$. We can blow up these non-compact surfaces to get smooth non-compact surfaces which are remarkably, Calabi-Yau. It's well known that inside the smooth surface, we get a bunch of $\mathbb{P}^{1}$'s linked together nodally, precisely like the corresponding Dynkin diagram. For the easiest example, note that for $\mathbb{C}^{2}/\mathbb{Z}_{2}$, the resulting smooth surface is the total space of the bundle $\mathcal{O}(-2) \to \mathbb{P}^{1}$. This is both non-compact and Calabi-Yau.

I was watching an old talk of Vafa's and he vaguely mentioned that in the six "extra dimensions" of string theory, you can take four of the six to come from one of these ADE spaces. It's unclear to me whether he meant the singular ones, or the smooth ones. This intrigued me. I know the physicists want these six dimensional spaces to be Calabi-Yau, so you can take for example, $X \times E$, where $X$ is one of these ADE surfaces and $E$ is an elliptic curve. Here $X$ can be either the smooth or the singular surface; both are Calabi-Yau as the resolution is 'Crepant'.

So my question is, have there been results on string theory compactified on ADE surfaces times an elliptic curve, or something similar? If so, I'd be extremely interested. I know there's been recent papers on the elliptic genera of the surfaces, but I'm curious if people have thought about topological string theory on a threefold intimately related to these ADE surfaces.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-02-05 11:29 (UTC), posted by SE-user spietro
asked Feb 4 in Theoretical Physics by spietro (95 points) [ no revision ]
see "ALE spaces"

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-02-05 11:29 (UTC), posted by SE-user Mitchell Porter

3 Answers

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

Since the OP keeps asking for the further compact dimensions, beyond the 4 of the \(\mathbb{C}^2/\Gamma\)-factor, this here just to highlight that, indeed, there is further compactification considered. For a whole zoo of 7-dimensional compactifications from 11d down to 4d on a 7d space that locally has such an ADE-factor, see

  • Michael Atiyah, Edward Witten M-Theory dynamics on a manifold of \(G_2\)-holonomy, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6 (2001) (arXiv:hep-th/0107177)

and for more background see at M-theory on \(G_2\)-manifolds

answered Feb 8 by Urs Schreiber (5,835 points) [ no revision ]
+ 3 like - 0 dislike

In the literature, we refer to an ALE space as being a solution to the field equations which is a blow up of $\mathbb C^2 / \Gamma$ for a finite subgroup $\Gamma \hookrightarrow \mathrm{SU}(2)$.

A paper by C.V. Johnson and others, Aspects of Type IIB Theory on ALE Spaces, considers the case of compactifying type $\mathrm{IIB}$ string theory on $\mathbb R^6 \times \mathcal M$ where $\mathcal M$ is an ALE space, which can be interpreted as a gravitational instanton.

The construction of the spaces $\mathcal M$ in the context of the theory is shown to be equivalent to how four-dimensional ALE spaces were constructed by Kronheimer in his classification, using hyper-Kahler quotients, viewing the spaces as Riemannian endowed with a hyper-Kahler structure.

More specifically, the vacua of two-dimensional $\mathcal N = 4$ supersymmetric field theories on D1-brane world volumes possess a spectrum related to the classification in terms of hyper-Kahler quotients, and these two-dimensional theories in turn are related to how ALE spaces are probed in the full theory considered.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-02-05 11:29 (UTC), posted by SE-user JamalS
answered Feb 4 by JamalS (885 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks a ton. So it sounds like from this answer, and the excellent one below, that in physics you compactify string theory on the two (complex) dimensional space $\mathcal{M}$. How then do you get to the famous 10 dimensions, or is this not needed for some reason? I was really hoping something like $\mathcal{M} \times E$ had been studied in physics where $E$ is an elliptic curve.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-02-05 11:29 (UTC), posted by SE-user spietro
+ 2 like - 0 dislike

M-theory compactified on a ADE singularity space is rather nice to describe qualitatively: Let $\Gamma\subset\mathrm{SU}(2)$ be an ADE group and consider the compactification of M-theory on $\mathbb{C}^2/\Gamma \times \mathbb{R}^{6,1}$. (Well, the actual compactification happens on $K3\times\mathbb{R}^{1,6}$ since the ALE space itself isn't compact, and when the $K3$ surface is singular, we locally model the singularity as $\mathbb{C}^2/\Gamma$.)

While the singularity is resolved by the crepant resolution, we have $\mathrm{rk}(\Gamma)$ homologically non-trivial 2-spheres which give a gauge group $\mathrm{U}(1)^{\mathrm{rk}(\Gamma)}$ by dimensional reduction of the M-theory 3-form since we get one harmonic 2-form for each non-trivial 2-sphere since homology and cohomology with real coefficients have the same dimension. In the singular limit the particles associated to M2-branes wrapped around the sphere become massless since the volume of the spheres goes to zero, and their transformation properties are precisely such that they behave analogously to W-bosons and we therefore get an enhanced gauge group in the singular limit, which is precisely the Lie group associated to $\Gamma$ by the ADE classification.

Of course, this seven-dimensional theory may be further reduced to a four-dimensional theory by compactifying three additional dimensions. For more details, see e.g. "M theory, $G_2$-manifolds and four-dimensional physics" by Acharya.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-02-05 11:29 (UTC), posted by SE-user ACuriousMind
answered Feb 4 by ACuriousMind (820 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$low
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...