Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

(propose a free ad)

The quaternionic group $\mathcal{Q}$ consists of the elements $1$, $-1$, $i$, $-i$,$j$,$-j$,$k$,$-k$ that satisfy the multiplication rules

$$i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$$

$$ ij=-ji=k$$

$$jk=-kj=i$$

$$ki=-ik=j$$

The quaternionic numbers $$a+ib+cj+dk$$ form a division algebra.

In Group Theory in a Nutshell on p61 A.Zee writes that those two structures are completely unrelated, but I almost cant swallow this.

Are the quaternionic group and the quaternionic numbers really completely unrelated?

I dont get it, is this some kind of trick question? The quaternion group is defined as taking the quaternion units as your group elements. Or in other words, if you allow your quaternion group elements to combine as basis elements in a vector space, you obtain quaternion numbers (you lose the original group structure though).

The quaternionic group is a finite subgroup of the multiplicative group of nonzero quaternionic numbers. That's how it has gotten its name.

Zee (who mistakenly writes quarternionic group and numbers) doesn't claim that they are completely unrelated, just that they are two different kinds of algebraic structures.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required