• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  What's the relationship between uncertainty principle and symplectic groups?

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

What's the relationship between uncertainty principle and symplectic groups? Do the symplectic groups mathematically capture anything fundamental about uncertainty principle?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-08-12 09:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user Problemania

asked Aug 11, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Problemania (25 points) [ revision history ]
edited Aug 12, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier
Why do you believe there is a relationship?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-08-12 09:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user ACuriousMind
You're not thinking of the Heisenberg group and its formulation in symplectic spaces, are you? See here and here. Symplectic groups are very different from the HG as the latter is nilpotent.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-08-12 09:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user WetSavannaAnimal aka Rod Vance

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Yes, of course, symplectic groups describe generalized situations that reveal the uncertainty principle.

The reason for the relationship is that the symplectic groups are defined by preserving an antisymmetric bilinear invariant, $$ M A M^T = A $$ where $M$ is a matrix included into the symplectic group is the equation holds and $A$ is a non-singular antisymmetric matrix.

Where does the uncertainty principle enter? It enters because $A$ may be understood to be the commutator (or Poisson bracket) of the basic coordinates $x_i,p_i$ on the phase space. If we summarize $N$ coordinates $x_i$ and $N$ coordinates $p_i$ into a $2N$-dimensional space with coordinates $q_m$, their commutators are $$ [q_m,q_n] = A_{mn} $$ with an antisymmetric matrix $A$. Consequently, the symplectic transformations may be defined as the group of all linear transformations mixing $x_i,p_i$, the coordinates of the phase space, that preserve the commutator i.e. all the uncertainty relations between the coordinates $q_m$.

Curved, nonlinear generalizations of these spaces are known as "symplectic manifolds" and nonlinear generalizations of the symplectic transformations above are known as "canonical transformations".

I think it doesn't make sense to talk about this relationship too much beyond the comments above because the relationship is in no way "equivalence". One may say lots of things about related concepts but they're in no way a canonical answer to your question – they don't follow just from the idea of the "relationship" itself. I just wanted to make sure that a relationship between mathematical structures on both sides, especially the antisymmetric matrix, certainly exists.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-08-12 09:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user Luboš Motl
answered Aug 12, 2014 by Luboš Motl (10,278 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights