Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,846 answers , 20,597 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Group theoretical links between SO(32) and $E_8 \times E_8$?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
36 views

T-duality is a canonical way to go from SO(32), or Spin(32) to $E_8 \times E_8$ and back. This is mentioned in some answers, e.g. T-duality between $E_8 \times E_8$ and $\text{Spin(}32)/\mathbb{Z}_2$ heterotic strings at the $\sigma$-model level

Is there some way to link both groups using only representation theory? For instance, SO(32) is decomposed to SU(16) or to SO(16)xSO(16) looks respectively as $$ 496 = (255)_0 ⊕ (1)_0 ⊕ (120)_4 ⊕ (\overline {120})_{−4} $$ $$ 496 = (16, 16) ⊕ (120, 1) ⊕ (1, 120)$$

very much as two copies of $E_8$, and of course we have $E_8 \times E_8$ itself branching to $ SO(16)$ as $$248 ⊕ 248 = (128′)⊕ (128′) ⊕(120) ⊕(120) $$

And also, if we have built the 496 of $SO(32)$ as a symmetrized pairing of 16 + 16 "particles and antiparticles", it can be further splitted to $256 + 240$, which is a more informal statement of the above branchings, and again looks as two copies of SO(16).

This kind of coincidencies is usually mentioned as lore (say Baez' TWF and similar) but rarely more substance is given. Is there more content here, thus? Such as actually defining $E_8$ as some action in those vector spaces that are also representations of subgroups of $SO(32)$? And viceversa?

Also, is $SO(16) \times SO(16)$ the only maximal common subgroup useful for this sort of descriptions?


This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-08-11 12:39 (UTC), posted by SE-user arivero

asked Aug 3 in Mathematics by arivero (10 points) [ revision history ]
edited Aug 11 by Dilaton
They share rank and order. What can you say about the difference of their Dynkin diagrams? Due diligence: re-read your Slansky. I very strongly suspect you'd find more takers in the math cousin of this site.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-08-11 12:39 (UTC), posted by SE-user Cosmas Zachos

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...