Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,928 questions , 1,396 unanswered
4,846 answers , 20,597 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Canonical definition of the integrand in planar $\mathcal{N}=4 \ \mathrm{SYM}$ theory

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
112 views

According to page 101 of Scattering Amplitudes (Elvang, Huang), one can use the zone variables $y$ to define a unique integrand, in the planar case.

This is done by saying that the momenta associated to an internal line is $y_a - y_b$ where $y_a$ and $y_b$ are the zone variable associated to the two zones adjacent to the particular line.

In this scheme, is it necessary to also devise a scheme to canonically label the interior zone variables, in order to obtain a well-defined integrand function?

To clarify, if one considers a double box integral, and swaps the two zone variables associated to the internal faces, one obtains two different contributions to the integrand. In fact, there will be two internal lines whose propagators are $(y_4 - y_a)^{-2} (y_2 - y_b)^{-2}$ which is not the same function if one swaps $a$ with $b$.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-12-05 17:38 (UTC), posted by SE-user giulio bullsaver
asked Dec 5, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by giulio bullsaver (30 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

Good question. The answer is that one can always (completely) symmetrize the integrand with respect to $L!$ loop variables. For instance, the two-loop 

        1                    2
         \       x1        /
          \_________/
          |        |       |
   x4   | y1  | y2  |  x2
          |____|____|
         /                  \
       /          x3        \
      4                        3
integral in dual coordinates is (the numerator is chosen so that the integral is dual-conformally invariant):
$$\int \frac{d^4y_1 d^4 y_2}{2!} \frac{(x_1-x_3)^4(x_2-x_4)^2}{(y_1-x_3)^2(y_1-x_4)^2(y_1-x_1)^2(y_2-x_1)^2(y_2-x_2)^2(y_2-x_3)^2(y_1-y_2)^2} + (y_1 \leftrightarrow y_2)$$

People usually write these integrals in momentum-twistor variables. As you remember, to each of the loop variables $y_i$ there is an associated pair of twistors $(Z_{A_i},Z_{B_i})$. The above integral turns out to be 
$$\int_{(A_1 B_1, A_2 B_2)} \frac{\langle 1234 \rangle^2 \langle 2341 \rangle}{\langle A_1 B_1 41 \rangle \langle A_1 B_1 12 \rangle \langle A_1 B_1 23 \rangle \langle A_2 B_2 23 \rangle \langle A_2 B_2 34 \rangle \langle A_2 B_2 41 \rangle \langle A_1 B_1 A_2 B_2 \rangle},$$
where $(A_1 B_1, A_2 B_2)$ means that the integration measure has a factor of $\frac{1}{2!}$ in it from the symmetrization $(A_1 B_1 \leftrightarrow A_2 B_2$.

answered Jan 7 by physicsworks (40 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$low
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...