# Why is the R-symmetry in $\mathcal{N}=4$ $SU(4)$ and not $U(4)$?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
77 views

In $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM we have 4 supercharges. Naively, I would have thought that the R-symmetry would be $U(4)$. I know that in theories with less SUSY the $U(1)$ can be anomalous. But $\mathcal{N}=4$ is a SCFT, and the R-charge appears in the SUSY algebra on the r.h.s. of the anticommutators $\{S,Q\}$ and cannot be anomalous without breaking SCFT. So why do we lose the $U(1)$ in $\mathcal{N}=4$?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:30 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dan

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

Only the $su(4)$ generators appear on the right hand side of the $u(2,2|4)$ commutation relations, so superconformal invariance does not prevent an anomaly in the $u(1)$ reducing the symmetry to $su(2,2|4)$. In $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM the central charge is furthermore zero, so the actual symmetry is $psu(2,2|4)$.

The breaking of the generator with non-zero supertrace is related to the Konishi anomaly.

However, an easier way to see that the R-symmetry is $SU(4)$ is to construct $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM from 10D $\mathcal{N}=1$ SYM by compactification on $T^6$. The R-symmetry then comes from the breaking $SO(9,1) \to SO(3,1) \times SO(6)$.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:30 (UCT), posted by SE-user Olof
answered Dec 7, 2013 by (210 points)
Ok, but the theory is finite so the U(1) still can't be anomalous. The N^2 U(N) currents should still be in the same multiplet as the energy momentum tensor, an anomaly in the U(1) would yield a non-zero beta function. Are you saying that there really is an anomaly that kills the U(1)? I find it more likely that the U(1) is just represented as 1 on all physical states, but I don't know why this would be

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:30 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dan
@Dan: I think the related anomaly should be the Konishi anomaly, but I don't remember the details.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:30 (UCT), posted by SE-user Olof
Good call, I like the dimensional reduction answer

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:30 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dan
+ 2 like - 0 dislike

It is not an answer, but maybe some information which could be useful :

In an other post, it has been also noticed that the commutators of the $R$-symmetry generators with supercharge generators are:

$[R^a_b,Q^c_{\alpha}]=\delta^c_bQ^a_{\alpha}-\frac{1}{4}\delta^a_bQ^c_{\alpha}$

So, taking the trace (on $a,b$), with $\mathcal N=4$, gives a null commutator, so the $U(1)$ symmetry may be factored out.

In "Pierre Ramond, Group Theory, A Physicist's Survey, Cambridge, p $218$", it is stated that the superalgebra $su(n|m)$, may be wiritten in terms of hermitian matrices of the form :

$$\begin {pmatrix}SU(n) &( \textbf n, \bar{\textbf m})\\( \bar {\textbf n}, \textbf m)&SU(m)\end {pmatrix} + \begin {pmatrix} n&0\\0&m\end {pmatrix}$$ where the diagonal matrix generates the $U(1)$. (so the even elements form the Lie algebra $SU(n) \times SU(m) \times U(1)$)

It is stated that : "when $n=m$, the supertrace of the diagonal matrix vanishes, and the $U(1)$ decouples from the algebra".

This is also true for non-compact versions of the superalgebra, for instance $su(2,2|4)$ (here $n=m=4$)

[EDIT]

Correction : Following Olof's comment below, the $U(1)$ here is the (zero )central charge, so the symmetry group is really $psu(2,2|4)$ (see Olof's answer). It is not the $U(1)$ necessary to extend $su(2,2|4)$ to $u(2,2|4)$

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:30 (UCT), posted by SE-user Trimok
answered Dec 7, 2013 by (950 points)
Just to clearify: the $u(1)$ generated by the diagonal matrix here is the central charge I mentioned in my answer (it's central for $m=n=2$). The $su(2,2|4)$ algebra can be extended to $u(2,2|4)$ by including a second diagonal generator with non-vanishing super trace, so of the form $\text{diagonal}(+n,-m)$.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-07 16:30 (UCT), posted by SE-user Olof

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$OverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.