• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Can i extend the non-linear realization of the chiral group to $U$ with complex pions?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

In chiral perturbation theory we build a Lagrangian invariant under $SU(2)_L\times{}SU(2)_R$ which acts on the matrix $U$ that accommodates the pion degrees of freedom in the following way


where $L\in{}SU(2)_L$, $R\in{}SU(2)_R$ and $U=e^{i\sigma_i\phi_i/f}$ where $f$ is a constant with mass dimensions, $\sigma_i$ are the Pauli matrices and $\phi_i$ are real scalar fields.

Now, this is not a representation of $SU(2)_L\times{}SU(2)_R$ acting on some vector field because the $U$ matrix is a $SU(2)$ matrix and adding to $SU(2)$ matrices doesn't in general give another $SU(2)$ matrix. I have been told that this is rather a *non-linear realization*. I have checked the wiki page but it is beyond my confort zone. In any case, the question I have is very somple. I want to consider a theory with a $\mathcal{U}$ defined analogously to $U$ where now I allow the $\phi_i$ fields to be complex. 

Is it legitimate to consider a non-linear realization of $SU(2)_L\times{}SU(2)_R$ on $\mathcal{U}$?

asked Nov 26, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Dmitry hand me the Kalashnikov (735 points) [ no revision ]

Well, complex  \(\phi\)would correspond to a non-compact coset space, which should get you a negative kinetic term for the imaginary part of the goldstone fields when you expand out the exponentials. That's a ghost of the bad type, so I don't know if it can be saved.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights