• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Internal flavor symmetry of the $N$ left-handed complex Weyl spinors v.s. $N$ real Majorana spinors: ${\rm U}(N)$ vs. ${\rm O}(2N)$ or ${\rm O}(N)$

+ 6 like - 0 dislike

Consider 4d spacetime, it seems that for massless particles, we can easily change

  • the left-handed complex Weyl spinor basis (2 component in complex $\mathbb{C}$ for Euclidean spacetime Spin(4))


  • the real Majorana spinor basis (4 component in real $\mathbb{R}$ for Euclidean spacetime Spin(4))

So naively, we can change N left-handed complex Weyl spinors to N real Majorana spinors.

However, the internal flavor symmetry of the N left-handed complex Weyl spinors is $G_{Weyl}=$ U(N).

Puzzle 1: What are the internal flavor symmetry of N real Majorana spinors? $G_{Majorana}=?$ Is that O(N) or O(2N)?

Puzzle 2: Why the internal flavor symmetry of the N left-handed complex Weyl spinors different from N real Majorana spinors?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-28 23:03 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
asked Apr 5, 2020 in Theoretical Physics by annie marie heart (1,205 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

The symmetry depends on the Lagrangian.

Let $\gamma^\mu$ be a real representation of the Dirac matrices for 4d spacetime, and define $\Gamma := \gamma^0\gamma^1\gamma^2\gamma^3$. Then $\Gamma$ is also a real matrix, and $\Gamma^2=-1$.

If $\psi$ is a Majorana spinor field (with self-adjoint components), then the corresponding left-handed Weyl spinor is $$ \newcommand{\pl}{\partial} \newcommand{\opsi}{\overline\psi} \newcommand{\cL}{{\cal{L}}} \psi_L := \frac{1+i\Gamma}{2}\psi. $$ So yes, the Weyl spinor $\psi_L$ may be written in terms of the Majorana spinor $\psi$ and conversely, but the two Lagragnians $$ \cL \propto \opsi_L \gamma^\mu\pl_\mu\psi_L \hskip2cm \cL' \propto \opsi \gamma^\mu\pl_\mu\psi $$ are not the same. (I'm suppressing the flavor index.) In particular, they have different flavor symmetries. If we start with $\cL$ and rewrite it in terms of the Majorana spinor, we get $$ \cL \propto \opsi \gamma^\mu\pl_\mu\frac{1+i\Gamma}{2}\psi, $$ which is different than $\cL'$. The flavor symmetry of $\cL$ is still $U(N)$. To see this, use the identity $$ i\psi_L = -\Gamma\psi_L $$ to see that multiplying the Weyl spinor $\psi_L$ by $i$ is the same as multiplying the Majorana spinor $\psi$ by $-\Gamma$, after which its components are still self-adjoint. This shows that every $U(N)$ flavor transformation of the original version of $\cL$ can be re-written as an equivalent flavor transformation of the new version of $\cL$, using $-\Gamma$ in place of $i$, so the flavor symmetry group is still (isomorphic to) $U(N)$.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-28 23:03 (UTC), posted by SE-user Chiral Anomaly
answered Apr 5, 2020 by Chiral Anomaly (70 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights