Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,851 answers , 20,619 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Total reflection for perpendicular incidence

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
666 views

Are there any materials, which give similar effects to total internal reflection, but for perpendicular incidence?

Here, by this phenomena I mean:

  • 100% reflection for bulk medium,
  • no absorption (including no absorption inside material),
  • finite evanescence depth (even if very small).

I am asking, as some of my calculations gave this result. Yet, I am not sure whether this result is physical (i.e. can happen) or practical (i.e. there is a system exhibiting such phenomenon).

I does works that way for dielectric mirrors. I am curious if there are any "uniform" materials exhibiting such effect. By "uniform" I mean spatial period (or any kind of other structure) much, much smaller than (vacuum) wavelength.

(Obviously, it goes beyond refraction index, so please don't write it is not possible with a fixed n, because I know.)

asked Dec 4, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Piotr Migdal (1,260 points) [ revision history ]
edited Dec 4, 2014 by Piotr Migdal
Do you really mean "internal"?
Reflection from metals will do or not?
I don't know in "internal" is the most fortunate word here. In any case I mean: exponential decay of the field in the medium (from which the reflection occurs) without any absorption. For metal - I was thinking about it. But AFAIR (I can be wrong) in metals reflection is due high absorption for transmission.
Then simply "reflection" would do.

In metals there are normal and anomalous skin effects with evanescent behavior.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ys$\varnothing$csOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...