# From 3-framings on $\Sigma$ to $\mathrm{Spin}^c$-structures on $\mathrm{Loc}_G(\Sigma)$?

+ 8 like - 0 dislike
1544 views

Here is my question, below that some motivation:

For $G$ a compact abelian Lie group and $\Sigma$ a surface, with $M_G = \mathrm{Loc}_G(\Sigma)$ denoting the space of flat $G$-connections on $\Sigma$ (the "Jacobian", itself a torus)... is there a natural map

• from the moduli space of 3-framings of $\Sigma$ (i.e. of trivializations of $T \Sigma \oplus \underline{\mathbb{R}}$);

• to the moduli space of stable $\mathrm{Spin}^c$-structures on $M_G$

?

Here "a natural map" may be too vague (though say if some interesting map springs to mind), but to make it more specific I first need to say the following.

Suppose we are handed a line bundle $\theta \in \mathcal{O}(\mathrm{Loc}_G(\Sigma))$, thought of as the prequantum line bundle of $G$-Chern-Simons theory, then traditional geometric quantization constructs a projectively flat vector bundle on the Riemann moduli space $\mathcal{M}_\Sigma$ -- the Hitchin connection -- whose fiber over a complex structure of $\Sigma$ is the space of holomorphic sections of $\theta$ with respect to a complex structure on $\mathrm{Loc}_G(\Sigma)$ that is naturally induced from that of $\Sigma$.

In the perspective of $\mathrm{Spin}^c$-quantization this construction is understood as forming in $\mathrm{KU}$-theory the push-forward of $\theta$ to the point, with respect to the $\mathrm{KU}$-orientation given by the complex structure regarded as a $\mathrm{Spin}^c$-structure.

These traditonal constructions are time-honored, but, when one gets to the bottom of it, are somewhat ad-hoc. Something is clearly right about them, but the main reason why we choose complex structures on $\Sigma$ to induce complex structures on $\mathrm{Loc}_G(\Sigma)$ to finally perform Kähler quantization is that it happens to work.

On the other hand, the cobordism hypothesis gives a systematic way to approach this: regarding the "Chern-Simons 3-bundle" $\mathbf{B}G \to \mathbf{B}^3 U(1)$ (the map on moduli stacks refining the cup product) as a fully dualizable object in $\mathrm{Corr}_3(\mathrm{Sh}_\infty(\mathrm{Mfd})_{/\mathbf{B}^3 U(1)})$ defines a "local prequantum field theory" $\mathrm{Bord}_3^{\mathrm{fr}}\to \mathrm{Corr}_3(\mathrm{Sh}_\infty(\mathrm{Mfd})_{/\mathbf{B}^3 U(1)})$ which sends a closed surface $\Sigma$ to the transgression bundle $\theta$.

To turn this into an actual QFT with values in (3-fold) $\mathrm{KU}$-modules at least in codimension 1 (that's all I will consider here) we are to naturally produce stable $\mathrm{Spin}^c$-structures on $\mathrm{Loc}_G(\Sigma)$. The cobordism hypothesis says that the "geometric moduli" on $\Sigma$ that we may and have to use for this are not a priori complex structures on $\Sigma$, but are 3-framings on $\Sigma$: it asks us to construct a flat $\mathrm{KU}$-module bundle on the moduli space of 3-framings of $\Sigma$.

Therefore finally the more concrete version of my question:

what might be a natural map from the moduli of 3-framings on $\Sigma$ to that of stable $\mathrm{Spin}^c$-structures on $\mathrm{Loc}_G(\Sigma)$ such that for given $\theta$ the induced flat bundle on 3-framing moduli is a pullback of the Hitchin connection along a map from 3-framing moduli to complex moduli (or something close)?

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-11-02 16:35 (UTC), posted by SE-user Urs Schreiber
asked Sep 10, 2014
retagged Nov 2, 2014
Chris Schommer-Pries has kindly pointed out that there should be a positive answer to the second of my questions: the projectively flat Hitchin connection on the Riemann moduli space canonically lifts to a genuinely flat connection on the 3-framing moduli space. This follows with a) Segal's deprojectivization, 2) the fact that "Atiyah 2-framings" provide "level-12 riggings" and 3) the observation (which Chris kindly highlighted) that there is a canonical functor from the 1-type of 3-framings to that of "Atiyah 2-framings" (see ncatlab.org/nlab/show/modular+functor#TopologicalLift).

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-11-02 16:35 (UTC), posted by SE-user Urs Schreiber

## Your answer

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ys$\varnothing$csOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.