• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,873 answers , 20,701 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

What does "light cone distribution" mean in QCD?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

I read that term in a paper recently and I wonder what it means. What's the difference between a normal distribution?

asked Oct 2, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by anonymous [ no revision ]

I think it means parton distribution function in a light cone frame, it has nothing to do with "normal distribution" in statistics, it's asking what the cross section for a particular perturbative QCD scattering will be if you smack together two protons. There are parton distribution functions that tell you the likelihood of a parton carrying a fraction of the momentum of the proton hitting another parton on the other proton. I'm not sure this is what is meant here, because you didn't link the paper.

1 Answer

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

Without a specific reference it is difficult to determine the exact context the author meant with the phrase "light cone distribution".  However, since you mention QCD, it is worth discussing what it likely meant. 

The light-cone quantization of quantum chromodynamics [1] was developed in 1991 by Stanley Brodsky and Hans-Christian Pauli.  In that paper they contrast time-ordered perturbation theory (TOPTH) with light-cone perturbation theory (LCPTH).  The advantage of using LCPTH is that it eliminates the need for vacuum creation graphs in perturbative calculations.  Specifically,

In TOPTH, all intermediate states contribute to the total amplitude as long as three-momentum is conserved... The existence of vacuum creation and annihilation
graphs implies that one cannot even compute any current matrix element without
considering the effect of the currents arising from pair production from the

The light cone approach allows for calculation of interaction cross sections and jet distributions,

One of the most interesting applications of LCPTH would be the perturbative
calculation of the annihilation cross section \(R_{e^+e^-} \), since one would automatically
calculate, to the same order in perturbation theory, the quark and gluon jet distributions
appearing in the final state.

The light cone approach is sufficiently suitable for calculations that there is an organization which promotes its use in physics called the International Light Cone Advisory Committee (ILCAC) [2]. In its most modern form, the use of LCPTH is now referred to as Light Front Quantum Chromodynamics (LFQCD) [3].

So in answer to the question, the light cone distribution derived from LCPTH is not contrasted with the normal distribution, but with something one might call the time ordered distribution derived from TOPTH.

[1] Brodsky, S., Pauli, H.C., (1991) Light-Cone Quantization of Quantum Chromodymanics, SLAC-PUB-5558, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-5558.pdf

[2] International Light Cone Advisory Committee, http://www.ilcacinc.org/

[3] Bakker et. al. (2013), Light Front Quantum Chromodynamics, SLAC-PUB-15745, JLAB-THY-13-1804, http://www.ilcacinc.org/ILCAC-WP-FINAL-201309.pdf

answered Nov 15, 2014 by Username (140 points) [ revision history ]
edited Nov 16, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights