# Is the starting distribution in the solution of DGLAP IR-bare?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
725 views

On p.27 of this paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0409313) by John Collins, he says that when defining PDFs in terms of partonic number operators, one acquires an IR-divergent bare PDF (eq. 52). The residue of the IR-divergent term is proportional to the DGLAP splitting kernels:
$$f_{a/b}(\xi,\epsilon)=\delta_{ab}\delta(1-\xi)-\frac{1}{\epsilon}\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}P^{(1)}_{a/b}(\xi)+\mathcal{O}(\alpha^2_s).$$

Now, when we solve the DGLAP equations formally, we find the solution
$$f_i(x,\mu^2)=f_i(x,\mu^2_0)+\sum_j\int^{\mu^2}_{\mu^2_0}d\ln\mu^{\prime2}\int^1_x\frac{dz}{z}P_{ij}(z,\alpha_s(\mu^{\prime2}))f_j(\frac{x}{z},\mu^{\prime2}).$$

Is the $f_i(x,\mu^2_0)$ the same IR-bare PDF from above? Can I see the splitting kernels as a kind of IR counter terms to cancel the remaining IR divergence in the bare PDF?

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.