# Why $U_\theta \mid 0 \rangle_M$ is boost invariant in $ER=EPR$ ?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
1533 views

The question is from $ER=EPR$  http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/1306.0533, page 37, the authors claim that $U_\theta \mid 0 \rangle_M$ is boost invariant. I did not see the reasons. Sorry for my naive question.

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

The answer is in the same document, § 2.1 AdS Black Holes , page 4

The thermofield hamiltonian (2.2) generates boosts which are translations of the usual hyperbolic angle $\omega$. One can think of the boost as propagating upward on the right side of the Penrose diagram, and downward on the left. The state (2.1) is an eigenvector of $H_{tf}$ with eigenvalue zero, and is therefore boost invariant.

and then page 37

For any non-trivial $\theta$ these are states that are boost invariant and differ from the Minkowski vacuum.

those above.

answered Oct 21, 2017 by (150 points)

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ys$\varnothing$csOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.