# How to calculate gravity path integrals about an AdS background?

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
591 views

Suppose I have some Lagrangian of some higher derivative gravity coupled to a may be matter fields. Now I want to fluctuate it to quadratic order about an AdS background and calculate the 1-loop partition function.

Can someone point to a reference where such a thing might be done? This sounds like something standard which someone would have done...

I can't see how one can even write down the fluctuated Lagrangian to quadratic order...And even if I wrote that down, how does one impose that the background is AdS? Then the issues of gauge fixing and ghosts are only added complication..

I can imagine calculating the first order variation in the Christoffel symbols and Riemann and Ricci tensors but that goes only so far.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-06-08 08:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user user6818
asked Jun 6, 2014
What is the problem to take Lagrangian and expand it to any order? as an example of how people expand you may have a look at arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9901121 or other classical papers like Freedman, D'Hocker,... There are not so many results about one-loop diagrams with legs in AdS. Fast googling gives arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0506185 and arxiv.org/abs/1007.2653

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-06-08 08:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user John
@John Thanks! Let me see the references. What I am confused about is how is the gauge fixed and ghosts introduced for doing this path-integral over metric fluctuations...also has anyone calculated 4-point stress-tensor correlations from the gravity side?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-06-08 08:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user user6818
Before Faddeev and Popov discovered their ghosts people had already computed a lot in various gauges. It seems that AdS/CFT computations are still difficult enough for people, so that they do want to be so general as to introduce ghosts. At least you cannot see ghosts in any of the classical papers. The best you can find is four-point of scalars from exchange of something in the bulk arxiv.org/pdf/1404.5625.pdf and refs therein

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-06-08 08:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user John

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$wThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.