Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,851 answers , 20,616 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

How to calculate backreaction in AdS space?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
155 views

This might be a very straight forward and basic question in GR. I am interested in calculating backreaction due to certain matter field (say, scalar) in AdS space.

  1. Should I put the energy-momentum tensor ($T_{\mu \nu}$) for the scalar field into the Einstein equation with negative cosmological constant and try to solve it subject to some symmetries? (I feel this can be a difficult task!)

  2. Can I somehow use the original $AdS$ metric and see how the matter field (perturbatively) change it. I think this is the original idea of backreaction on some particular background. But don't have any idea how to implement it practically.

  3. Is there any subtlety involved due to non-trivial asymptotic behavior of $AdS$ space compared to Minkowski space.

  4. Any further simplification to this computation if I work specifically in $AdS_3$?

Any good references (books or original articles) on this topic where explicit calculations have been done will be highly appreciated.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-08-27 07:53 (UTC), posted by SE-user pinu
asked Aug 27, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Physics Moron (280 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

If you are ok with a computation of the self-force to linear order, it is best to use linear perturbations of the AdS background. I do not know whether this has been done for AdS in any non-horrible way (it may be non-obviously buried in some paper), but I certainly liked the treatment of linearized waves on dS by Bini, Cappozziello and Esposito.

The obvious problem with AdS are the boundary conditions at conformal infinity, but if you care about some immediate self-force, i.e. not something such as a particle accelerating throughout the whole cosmic history, this should be possible to hand-waive away (but maybe you are even interested in the interaction with boundary conditions because of AdS/CFT, those are unknown waters for me). I don't think AdS3 will be any simpler, but one should expect the solutions to be very different in every such low dimension.

answered Aug 30, 2015 by Void (1,505 points) [ no revision ]

@Void Thank you for answering. Actually I was thinking about an ansatz based method may be very useful here. Suppose I start with the AdS metric and by imposing some symmetries (asymptotically the metric should remain AdS, etc) if I could write down an ansatz for the metric with few new parameters. Then by demanding that it should satisfy Einstein equations I can fix those parameters. Is it a right way of thinking about this problem? May be it won't give me very general result for the metric.. I don't know. 

@pinu By this method, you will obtain the field of a specific source which you do not have under control. Generically, the source will include negative matter and all sorts of things you do not really like. If you just want to see how self-force works for "some" source, I would instead recommend to read it off from some exact solution such as the C-Metric, see http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0510101v1.pdf

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...