Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

146 submissions , 123 unreviewed
3,961 questions , 1,408 unanswered
4,911 answers , 20,872 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
519 active unimported users
More ...

  Duality between Euclidean time and finite temperature, QFT and quantum gravity, and AdS/CFT

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
194 views

The thoughts below have occurred to me, several years ago (since 200x), again and again, since I learn quantum field theory(QFT) and statistical mechanics, and later AdS/CFT. It is about the duality and the correspondence between Euclidean time and finite temperature, QFT and quantum gravity, and AdS/CFT.

So let me summarize the duality between them below as (1)~(5). This can be read from, for example A Zee's book on QFT and for AdS/CFT review, read from any arXiv review of it.

(1). Euclidean QFT in (d+1) -dimensional spacetime

∼ Classical statistical mechanics in (d+1) -dimensional space

∼ Classical statistical mechanics in (d+2) -dimensional spacetime (where time does not play much the role)

-

(2). Euclidean QFT in (d + 1)-dimensional spacetime, $0 \leq \tau \leq \beta$

∼ Quantum statistical mechanics in (d)-dimensional space

∼ Quantum statistical mechanics in (d+1)-dimensional spacetime

-

(3). Euclidean QFT in (d+1)-dimensional spacetime

∼ High-temperature quantum statistical mechanics in (d+1)-dimensional space

∼ High-temperature quantum statistical mechanics in (d+2)-dimensional spacetime

- The above (1)~(3) relations can be more precise from considering the partition function of both sides of the duality: $$ Z=\text{tr}[e^{-\beta H}]=\int_{\text{periodic boundary}} D\phi e^{-\int^\beta_0 d\tau_E \int d^\text{d} d x L(\phi)} $$

here $\tau_E$ is the Euclidean time with periodic boundary condition.

-

In AdS/CFT correspondence, or gauge-gravity duality, we learn that

(4). QFT in (d+1)-dimensional spacetime

∼ quantum graivty in (d+2)-dimensional spacetime

where the bulk radius plays the rule of the renormalization group (RG) energy scale. Such a correspondence has a strong-weak coupling duality, e.g.

(5). QFT in (d+1)-dimensional spacetime at strong coupling

∼ classical graivty in (d+2)-dimensional spacetime at weak coupling

The duality can be made more precise between:

SU($N_c$) $\mathcal{N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills and AdS$_5 \times S_5$

$\frac{R^2}{\alpha'} \sim \sqrt{g_s N_c} \sim \sqrt{\lambda},\;\;\; g_s \sim g_{YM}^2 \sim \frac{\lambda}{N_c},\;\;\; \frac{R^4}{\ell_p^4} \sim \frac{R^4}{\sqrt{G}} \sim N_c$

the large $N_c$, number of colors indicates the small gravitational constant $G$.


My Question:

Given the relation between the AdS bulk radius as a energy $E$ scale, which is basically related to a time $t$ scale and the temperature via the dimensional analysis

$$[E]\sim 1/[t] \sim [T]$$ and given the hinting relations between gravity and thermodynamics via S Hawking and T Jacobstein works, and perhaps E Verlind, etc.

and Given the suggestive relations between Quantum in (d+1) dim and classical thermo/gravity in (d+2) dim of (1)~(5).

How much have we known and have been explored in the literatures about the relations between (1)~(3) and (4)~(5)? e.g. the relations between:

the duality between Euclidean time and finite temperature (e.g. QFT and thermal-statistical mechanics)

and

AdS/CFT duality?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-06-25 20:52 (UCT), posted by SE-user Idear
asked Jun 21, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by wonderich (1,420 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...