# Radon transform, Buffon's needle and Integral geometry

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
3945 views

In all the literature that I have seen it is mentioned that these two are "branches" of integral geometry, but no where I can see the exact connection since one is connected with probability and the other is an integral.

Can somebody explain the connection in a clear way. Thanks

I have seen this, but it is not clear.

also, this material is related to this

"Conventional Quantum Mechanics Without
Wave Function and Density Matrix"

-1. This doesn't seem to be related to physics even remotely. Could be my ignorance though, I'd be happy to retract -1 if some one can point out a connection.

@QSA, ah, ok, I see and +1. I would suggest you put the physics background in the main post.

@Jia Yiyang, This is related to the relatively new exciting field(for me) of Quantum tomography.

Since it was my first post my browser was doing strange things, so I added the related material in the comments.

@JiaYiang com'on let him ;-), PhysicsOverflow will never be flooded by mathematics, as the mathematicians have their own nice MathOverflow. And even if there are some questions that are on-topic on both sites (MathOverflow supports some theoretical physics too), so what? PhysicsOverflow should certainly not copy the anti-math attitude represented on some other physics Q&A sites, on the contrary we should adopt a much more reasonable point of view.

Probability and integration are the same thing since Kolmogorov. The connections between these things is explained on Wikipedia. The question is very broad, it is not clear what answer is expected.

@Ron Maimon,Thanks for the reply. Yes, I am aware of the general idea. However, this situation is a bit more complicated. from the reference I gave,it says(referening to Buffon's needle as adjoint):

" As explained in [a3], Chapt. 5, the solution leads to the consideration of a measure  on the space of all lines in the plane and of  invariance under all rigid motions. This measure induces a functional  on the family of compact sets  by....

I need the clarification for that. Any reference is appreciated.

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). Please complete the anti-spam verification