• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,728 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Operator Product Expansion (OPE) in Conformal Field Theory

+ 7 like - 0 dislike

We denote local operators of a conformal field theory (CFT) as $\mathcal{O}_i$ where $i$ runs over the set of all operators. Formally, the operator product expansion (OPE) is given by,

$$\mathcal{O}_i(z,\bar{z})\mathcal{O}_j(\omega,\bar{\omega}) = \sum_{k} C^k_{ij}(z-\omega,\bar{z}-\bar{\omega})\mathcal{O}_k(\omega,\bar{\omega})$$

where we have left the $\langle...\rangle$ implicit. My question is primarily, in practice, how does one determine the operator product expansion for an explicit case? Is the OPE similar to a Laurent expansion? In which case, can one determine the residues from the OPE? I would appreciate an explicit non-trivial example.

I'm following String Theory and M-Theory by Becker, Becker and Schwarz, and the OPE is dealt with somewhat rapidly.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-05-04 11:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user user45666
asked May 1, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by user45666 (35 points) [ no revision ]

2 Answers

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

In the limit of the positions of two operator insertions approaching one another, the product of those two operators can be approximated as a series of local operators. This can be done to arbitrary accuracy and within conformal field theory, the expression is exact.

The series described above will in general have singular behaviour. At first, this might sound bad, but this is actually the key point of the whole formalism. In fact, all the physical information we are interested in is encoded in the singularities. As a consequence, regular terms are usually not even written down.

An explicit example would be the OPE of the conformal stress energy tensor with itself, given by

$$T(z)T(z')=\frac{\partial T(z')}{z-z'}+\frac{2T(z')}{(z-z')^2}+\frac{c}{2(z-z')^4}+\dots,$$

where $c$ is the central charge and dots denote regular terms. Furthermore, this expression is to be understood as an operator expression within a vacuum expectation value. This is, for convenience, often omitted in the literature.

The terms I have written down above are singular in the limit $z\rightarrow z'$ and correspond to the residues of the OPE. As you have correctly suggested, the latter is formally equivalent to a Laurent series.

But why is the OPE of interest, other than for providing a convenient way of writing products of operators? It turns out that it encodes the transformation behaviour of an operator under conformal transformations. This can be shown by working out the respective Ward identities. Furthermore, the OPE contains information about the mode algebra of the operators, i.e. the Virasoro algebra.

As proof of the above statements would exceed the boundaries of my answer, I refer at this point to the literature. I can recommend both the book by Polchinski and two sets of lecture notes freely available on the internet by Maximilian Kreuzer and David Tong.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-05-04 11:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user Frederic Brünner
answered May 2, 2014 by Frederic Brünner (1,130 points) [ no revision ]
+ 1 like - 0 dislike

A hint about OPEs: They exist for CFTs in any dimension. They play nicely with the holomorphic phenomena in 2d, but they don't require it. They encode information about the singularities which occur when you multiply operator-valued distributions.

Explicit examples in higher dimension are computationally challenging.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-05-04 11:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user user1504
answered May 2, 2014 by user1504 (1,110 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights