• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,719 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Understanding Segal's definition of conformal field theory

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

I have a fundamental problem in understanding Segal's definition of a conformal field theory:

On the one hand his monoidal CFT-functor is a formalization of the fact that, physically, the integrand of the time evolution path integral depends only on the conformal structure of the parameterization space $\mathbb{S}^1 \times [0,T]$ of the world sheet. More general, we want different time evolution operators on the state space for every bounded Riemann surface (after a Wick rotation)..

On the other hand, veeery roughly speaking, he looks at the group of conformal maps on the infinite cylinder, throws out one half and complexifies it. The result are again Riemann surfaces, but now with two parameterized boundaries. Now he says that a CFT is simply a representation functor of this categorified semigroup $A$, ensuring that the action of "one half of the group of conformal maps on the infinite cylinder" (namely Diff($\mathbb{S}^1$)) on the state space is of positive energy..

My question is now, how are these two ideas related? Also, why do I want a representation of the group of conformal maps at all? Conformal maps lead to equivalent conformal structures, which we don't care for (at least i thought so)...

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-09-12 18:34 (UTC), posted by SE-user Bipolar Minds

asked Aug 28, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Bipolar Minds (25 points) [ revision history ]
edited Sep 12, 2015 by Dilaton

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights