Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,853 answers , 20,624 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

How to compute the absolute simplest case of operator product expansion

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
122 views

The operator product expansion seems to be a quite useful tool. In an attempt to find a full concise complete computation, involving deriving the coefficients, and introducing the taxonomy associated with using this tool, I have hit a wall. The gentle starting point  of  A(x)B(y) =sum C * (new Operator) is usually stated and the rest assumed to be common knowledge.  If we consider the case of a simple free field (composite field), how does one  find the coefficients and what is this new operator and what is its physical significance.  I think I tend to fair well when things are laid out fully and explicitly, not abstractly.   I think may be the definition and example  with energy momentum tensors shown in most conformal field theory textbooks is not what I am looking for.  I am looking for hopefully an explicit very  simple free quantum field theory showing fully how this is done.

asked Nov 6, 2016 in Recommendations by fake-student-silicon (0 points) [ no revision ]

Hi fake-student-silicon, we do have LaTex on PO, just in case you did not know ...

I once had a similar question

http://www.physicsoverflow.org/6878/systematic-approach-calculate-individual-operator-expansion?show=6878#q6878

but on that thread there is not yet an explicit calculation of a specifi example in the free field case.

Maybe you can make it a bit more clear already in the title, that you want to see the explicit calculation of a specific example?

For free fields one can simply apply Wick's theorem to products of normally ordered composite operators like $:\phi^2(x)::\phi^2(y):=4[\phi(x)\phi(y)]:\phi(x)\phi(y):+2[\phi(x)\phi(y)]^2$, where I use "[ ]" to denote contractions.

Hey guys thanks for the comments. I have seen  how it is done in in CFT, it seems they compute the variation of phi, and then compare it with [Q, A], this gives another variation. Then you should be able to read off OPE. Can someone actually show me all the steps, and can someone please help me with how this is done for like a simple scalar field theory.  @Dilaton  @Jia Yiyang

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...