• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

174 submissions , 137 unreviewed
4,308 questions , 1,640 unanswered
5,089 answers , 21,602 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
635 active unimported users
More ...

  From vertex function to anomalous dimension

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
  • In a $d$ dimensional space-time, how does one argue that the mass dimension of the $n-$point vertex function is $D = d + n(1-\frac{d}{2})$?

  • Why is the following equality assumed or does one prove that a function $f$ will exist such that, $\Gamma^n(tp,m,g,\mu) = f(t)\Gamma^n(p,m(t),g(t),\mu)$?

..in writing the above I guess one is assuming that all the inflowing momentum are equal to $p$ but if that is so then what is the meaning of again specifying the "renormalization scale" of $\mu$?..Does this somehow help fix the values of the functions, $m(t)$ and $g(t)$ at some value of $t$?..If yes, how?..

If the above equality is assumed as a property of the vertex function then it naturally follows that it satisfies the differential equation,

$[-t\frac{\partial}{\partial t} + m[\gamma_m(g)-1]\frac{\partial}{\partial m} + \beta(g)\frac{\partial}{\partial g} + [D-n\gamma(g)]]\Gamma^n(tp,m,g,\mu)=0$

where one defines,

$\beta(g) = t\frac{\partial g(t)}{\partial t}$

$m[\gamma_m(g)-1] = t\frac{\partial m(t)}{\partial t}$

$D-n\gamma(g) = \frac{t}{f}\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}$

and the last equality integrates to give, $f(t) = t^De^{-n\int_1^t \frac{\gamma(g(t))}{t}dt}$ and $-n\int_1^t \frac{\gamma(g(t))}{t}dt$ is defined as the "anomalous dimension".

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Mar 31, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by user6818 (960 points) [ no revision ]

Please log in or register to answer this question.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights