# Anomalous triangle vertex: divergencies and symmetry argument

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
65 views

Consider the triangle correlator of one axial-vector current $J_{\lambda 5}$ and two vector currents $J_{\mu}, J_{\nu}$ in a theory with a fermion with mass $m$:
$$\Gamma_{\lambda \mu\nu}(q,k,p) = F\bigg[\langle 0|T(J_{\lambda 5}(x)J_{\mu}(y)J_{\nu}(z) )|0\rangle \bigg]_{q,k,p},$$
where $F[]$ means the Fourier transformation. The momentum $q$ is $q = p+k$. By using the perturbation theory, it can be related to triangle diagram with massive fermion running in the loop.

Adler proposes to use tensor decomposition
$$\Gamma_{\lambda\mu\nu}(q,k,p) = A(p,k,m)\epsilon_{\lambda \mu\nu\rho}k^{\rho}+ \epsilon_{\nu \lambda \sigma\rho}p^{\sigma}k^{\rho}(B(p,k,m)p_{\mu}+C(p,k,m)k_{\mu})\\ + \begin{pmatrix} k \leftrightarrow p \\ \mu \leftrightarrow \nu\end{pmatrix},$$
following from lorentz covariance, parity symmetry and bose symmetry. This expansion has historical name Rosenberg expansion.

The ''form-factors'' $B, C$ have the dimension -2 in energy units, while $A$ has the dimension 0; this follows from the dimensionality of $\Gamma_{\lambda \mu\nu}$, which is 1. Therefore, since the form-factors are obtained by the loop integration, $A$ is potentially logarithmically divergent. However, actually it can be shown that it is finite assuming the vector-like current conservation. Really, one has $p^{\mu}\Gamma_{\lambda \mu \nu} = 0$, or
$$\tag 1 A(p,k,m) = B(p,k,m)p^{2} +C(p,k,m)(p\cdot k)$$
Therefore one knows that $\Gamma_{\lambda \mu \nu}$ is free from any divergences without any calculations, since now potentially diverged $A$ is expressed in terms of finite $B,C$ with finite pre-factors.

Let's now assume particular case $p = -k$ which corresponds to $q = 0$. For the vertex $\Gamma_{\lambda \mu \nu}$ one has the general form
$$\Gamma_{\lambda \mu \nu}(0, k, -k) = D(k^{2},m^{2})\epsilon_{\lambda \mu\nu\sigma}k^{\sigma},$$
where $D$ is dimension 0 and a priori contains logarithmic singularity.

My questions are the following:

• is it possible to use the identity $(1)$ for the case $p = -k$ by considering first the general case of unrelated $k,p$ and then by taking the limit

$$\Gamma_{\lambda \mu\nu}(0,k,-k) \equiv \lim_{p \to -k}\Gamma_{\lambda \mu\nu}(q,k,p)?$$

• if the answer on the previous question is no, is there any other way to ensure that $D$ contains or doesn't contain logarithmic divergence without direct computations of the loop integral?
asked Dec 9, 2017
edited Dec 9, 2017

## Your answer

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.