Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,853 answers , 20,624 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Anomalies in QFT books

+ 3 like - 1 dislike
188 views

Why in most QFT books when author discusses of non-invariance of measure of path integral (massless fermions interact with gauge fields) $$ \int D\bar{\Psi} D\Psi \to |\Psi \to U\Psi , \quad \bar{\Psi} \to \bar{\Psi} \bar{U},\quad U = e^{i \alpha (x) \gamma_{5}t},$$

$$\quad t^{\dagger} =t| \to \int D\bar{\Psi} D\Psi \det \left( U \right)^{-2} $$ and looks only on infinitesimal transformations $U \approx 1 + i\alpha(x)\gamma_{5}t$ he doesn't introduce something like fictive particles (fictive, but formally independent) called ghosts in non-abelian gauge theories? Instead of this he introduces something like monster (like in Weinberg's "QFT" Vol. 2) $$ \int D\bar{\Psi} D\Psi \to \int D\bar{\Psi} D\Psi e^{-2i\int d^{4}xTr \left[\gamma_{5}tf \left( \frac{(\gamma_{\mu}D^{\mu}_{x})^{2}}{M^{2}}\right)\delta (x - y)\right]_{y \to x}}, $$ which is equal to summation over eigenstates of $\gamma_{\mu}D^{\mu}$ operator without introducing the new fields.

I don't understand this.


This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-09-17 10:15 (UCT), posted by SE-user PhysiXxx

asked Sep 16, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by PhysiXxx (45 points) [ revision history ]
edited Sep 17, 2014 by 40227
Could you be more specific what you don't understand? Why do you think that the ghosts should be discussed here? It is the fermion measure that turns out to be non-invariant, not the ghost measure. Also, why should we need them for the eigenstates of the Dirac operator?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-09-17 10:15 (UCT), posted by SE-user ACuriousMind

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...