# Finding the approximate solution for Schrodinger equation by using variational method

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
83 views

I need to find the approximate solution of nonlinear Schrodinger equation $$i\hbar \partial_{t} \Psi + \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\Delta \Psi - g |\Psi|^{2}\Psi - \frac{m\omega^2 (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}{2}\Psi = 0$$ by using variational method. $\Psi$ has norm $\int |\Psi|^{2}d^{3}\mathbf r = N$, where N is the number of particles.

It was saying to me that I must start from the trial function $$\Psi (x, y, z) = h e^{-\frac{1}{2\omega^{2}}\left( x^2 + y^2 + z^2\right)}e^{\frac{i}{\hbar}\mu t},$$

where $\mu$ plays role of chemical potential.

So by using the property of $\Psi$ I got $h = \frac{\sqrt{N}}{(\omega \pi )^{\frac{3}{4}}}$. Then, due to the variational method, I must compute functional $J(N) = \langle \Psi | \hat {H}| \Psi\rangle$ and determine N from relation $\frac{\partial J (N)}{\partial N} = 0$. But I don't understand this step, because $N$ already is given in the task and equal to the integer number. So I don't have parameters in the trial function which can minimize functional $J(N)$.

Can you help me? Maybe, there is the mistake in the trial function and it must be some parameter $l^2$ instead of $\omega^{2}$?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-21 17:05 (UCT), posted by SE-user Andrew McAddams

recategorized Mar 25, 2014

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Minimizing the energy with respect to $N$ will give a relationship between $\mu$, $N$, and the other parameters of the system. This will fix the chemical potential to something like $\mu=gN$ (this is the correct value in the limit $\omega\to0$).

For sure the trial wave-function has a problem since $x^2/\omega^2$ is not dimensionless, but it seems quite obvious that you should just use the typical length scale given by the harmonic oscillator (that you called $l$, if I guess correctly).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-21 17:05 (UCT), posted by SE-user Adam
answered Dec 4, 2013 by (105 points)
Thank you. So you meaned that I get from $\langle \Psi |\hat {H}| \Psi \rangle$ expression $J(N, l)$ from the one side and $\mu$ from the another, which leads to fixing $\mu$? Is this step all that I must to do?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-21 17:05 (UCT), posted by SE-user Andrew McAddams
@AndrewMcAdams: because you're looking for an eigenstate of $\hat H$, you have $\langle \Psi|\hat H|\Psi\rangle/\langle \Psi|\Psi\rangle=\mu$, and you want to minimize this to get the ground-state (or to as close to it as possible with this ansatz).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-21 17:05 (UCT), posted by SE-user Adam

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$lowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.