Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,852 answers , 20,624 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

How do you renormalize the Schrodinger picture wave functional?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
130 views

So we know that correlation functions computed in a quantum field theory generically have to be renormalized, e.g. by introducing counterterms into the action, which remove UV divergences and leave the physical correlation functions dependent on renormalized couplings.  Now in the Schrodinger picture, we can compute correlation functions (at equal time) as moments of the evolving wave functional.  Presumably renormalization of the couplings in the Lagrangian through counterterms leads to additional pieces in the wave functional which ensure that its equal-time correlators are the appropriate renormalized ones.  I am wondering what the procedure is to account for this in evolving the wave functional, or if there is a particularly helpful paper, lecture, etc.

asked Nov 13, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Elliot Nelson (10 points) [ no revision ]

The action defines implicitly the representation of the Poincare group, and hence the way the wave functional propagates. The wave functional is quite arbitray, as it is the analogue of a wave function in QM; the dynamics is in the Hamiltonian, the generator of the time translations. This gets renormalized through the usual procedure,

I don't think that there is anything special to UV renormalization in the wave functional representation, the differences to the usual Fock space treatment show mostly in the IR, where the Fock approach is not flexible enough and misses, e,g, solitonic contributions.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...