• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

126 submissions , 106 unreviewed
3,683 questions , 1,271 unanswered
4,657 answers , 19,737 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
440 active unimported users
More ...

Are the upvote and downvote buttons too near to each other?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

It seems they are much nearer to each other than they are in stackexchange sites. Not sure if this is going to be a issue, I need to upvote/downvote quite a few times to see whether it makes me more prone to mis-click.

asked Mar 20, 2014 in Discussion by Jia Yiyang (2,435 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Mar 21, 2014 by dimension10

Polarkernel has now fixed this.  

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

I agree with you. This would be a better design:     

answered Mar 20, 2014 by dimension10 (1,950 points) [ no revision ]


Looks fine on posts with text. but not on lists of questions. Unfortunately, Q2A uses the same design for both. It would be feasible to use different designs, but this would be a larger change (takes time).

To me it seems, the arrows are more separated on the question lists too (?). And by the way it is always a good idea to judge a question not only by its title, but vote after reading it ... :-P. So, to me it seems good enough :-).

@Dilaton Yes, that's what I'm saying, because it is the same design.  But if the arrows have to be put above and below the vote count, as in the picture of diemsnion10, then the whole packet is too high in question lists.

Dimension10 seems to be happy with it as is now too, as he wrote [DONE] in the corresponding answer to the road map. 

@polarkernel Thanks, I think this is fine.  

It looks better, thank you all.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights