# Nonequilibrium themal QFT

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
83 views

Wick rotation to thermal of QFT in Minkowski space to thermal QFT, which is after this transformation analogue to statistical mechanics, does only describe equilibrium statistical mechanics. On page 227 of this paper it is said, that for dynamical questions beyond the equilibrium properties, the time coordinate has to be analytically continued to real Minkowski time.

This I do not understand at all. First of all, does analytic continuation not always generalize a real quantity to a complex quantity? This seems to go the other way round? Can somebody explain a bit why such an analytic continuation allows to describe the evolution of a system and how it works?

recategorized Apr 11, 2014
Note entirely sure I get your question. Does my answer on questions/71645 help (the time contour bit, not the bit about renormalization)?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-09 16:11 (UCT), posted by SE-user Michael Brown
Hi @MichaelBrown thanks very much, very nice post and it answers my stupid question here too, will have to carefully reread it :-).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-09 16:11 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

The point is that dynamics is an initial value problem, that does not make sense in the analytically continued version. Thus analytic continuation is of no real help in nonequilibrium problems (while it is an efficient approach to studying equilibrium).

Dynamical questions in QFT are usually addressed through the Schwinger-Keldysh (or CTP = closed time path) formalism. They lead to Kadanoff-Baym equations, which are equations for the time-correlation functions.

answered Apr 12, 2014 by (14,437 points)
+ 1 like - 0 dislike

While I may certainly be missing the point, aren't the authors simply saying that if you start with an Euclidean theory, which describes a system at equilibrium, and want to analyze the actual dynamics, you need to analytically continue to the usual real Minkoski time (and then try to solve the problem)? Start from a system with “Euclidean time” wrapped around a torus with circumference T^-1, as they say, and unwrap it to "Minkoski time" to analyze a non-equilibrium dynamical problem.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-09 16:11 (UCT), posted by SE-user user88104
answered Aug 14, 2013 by (10 points)

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:$\varnothing\hbar$ysicsOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.