Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,847 answers , 20,601 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

What is the use of Schwinger-Keldysh formalism?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
67 views

In non-equilibrium statistical mechanics, there is this formidable formalism, called the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. I have read about it, and I understand what it is.

However, what I what to know is if there are any concrete applications of this formalism that give answers that cannot be obtained by other techniques? For example, in calculating transport coefficients, are there problems that can be solved by Schwinger-Keldysh that cannot be solved by using the Boltzmann equation or the Kubo formula?


This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-07-02 10:56 (UTC), posted by SE-user Raghu Mahajan

asked Mar 9, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Raghu Mahajan (20 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jul 2 by Dilaton

1 Answer

+ 7 like - 0 dislike

In my opinion, the reason to be of the Keldysh formalism is that it is the way to write a path integral for non-equilibrium quantum systems. It provides an action which can be used to sample paths for out-of-equilibrium systems. This is great because it opens the door to the huge toolbox of equilibrium quantum field theory to non-equilibrium problems. I can give four examples that I know well. I am sure that there are many more.

  • The 2PI formalism was used in this, this and more recently this work. Non-equilibrium steady states are studied. The 2PI formalism makes it possible to re-sum an infinite series of diagrams and extract some kind of non-perturbative quantum Boltzmann equation. The collision integrals are then analysed and non-trivial scaling relations are extracted for the steady-state.

  • A very interesting parallel is made in between the Keldysn and Martin-Siggia-Rose / Janssen-DeDominicis (MSR) formalisms here. MSR tell us how to write a path integral for classical stochastic systems of differential equations. In this work the term that makes the Keldysh path integral different from the action obtained within MSR is identified. Then one can tell if a system is quantum or classical by finding out if this terms plays an important role or not.

  • In this paper, the property of being at thermal equilibrium is identified as a symmetry of the Keldysh action. The Keldysh formalism provides an action that is very general and can be used in any non-equilibrium situation. If the system reaches a steady state, this one may or may not follow a Gibbs distribution. It may or may not obey a fluctuation-dissipation theorem. These properties are hard to test for since they involve all the correlation functions of the system. Instead this work tells us that if the Keldysh action has the appropriate symmetry, then it is in thermal equilibrium. The fluctuation-dissipation relations even come out as Ward identities.

  • Renormalisation Group methods become available. In particular, the Functional Renormalisation Group is used here, here and more recently here. This makes it possible to study quantitatively far-from-equilibrium criticality. In particular, non-equilibrium critical exponents are computed.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-07-02 10:56 (UTC), posted by SE-user Steven Mathey
answered Sep 27, 2015 by Steven Mathey (350 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...