• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,726 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Import queue

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

Request questions from sites on the StackExchange networks that are on-topic here too, to be imported here. Moderators may then import the question.


This thread can not only be used to request importing single questions, but PhysicsOverflow members who like some or all of their (for PhysicsOverflow on topic) SE posts imported can say so in a corresponding answer here too. Any other specific list of questions is fine too.

asked Feb 8, 2014 in Public Official Posts by Dilaton (6,240 points) [ revision history ]
edited Feb 5, 2015 by dimension10
Most voted comments show all comments

@RonMaimon I agree, but hide, not delete (delete erases from the database itself).  

@Dilaton On SE, answers can be ordered by time if one needs to, but not here.  

@RonMaimon hiding is ok But concerning references and study material (concerning advanced topics) they newer cluttered any site on SE (not the ones I was interested in) so they will not here either. They were considered legitimate in TP.SE and they are not forbidden on MathOverflow. So please dont introduce this for (advanced) students and people who want to learn about a new topic obstructive SE point of view (in SE they always said you can ask in chat which means forget about it because there are no physics people in chat)

ok, but the point is that it shouldn't come with rep, and it's extremely easy to do, and it only needs to be done once in each topic, so perhaps when reviews are up, it can be done in reviews. You can ask the same question on each topic, I think it's best to make a literature review for each tag on reviews, so that each topic has a set of references people can add to. It's just not effort to find literature.

@Ron Maimon what do you mean exactly by "the post disappeared"?! I hope there's no auto-deletion in Q2A core, like there is on SE.  

I meant it moved to a random position in the questions list, it wasn't bumped anymore.

Most recent comments show all comments

Nah, I think we do not (yet) have to start deleting, this and the community moderation threads can naturally get pretty long, but I conjecture that thethe number of answers can get large but it should stay finite ...

Ok, hid them. If you find this annoying, unhide. I still think book recommendations belongs in meta, it will clutter up the main site. (I unhid them myself, as it caused the question to disappear for lack of activity)

167 Answers

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
answered Dec 27, 2021 by Rebour (10 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jan 3, 2022 by Dilaton
+ 0 like - 0 dislike
answered May 16, 2017 by apoorvkhurasia (0 points) [ no revision ]

We cannot import an answer without the question. Your answer is in fact not a complete answer to the question on SE, since you don't talk about the necessary reinterpretation of the notion of superposition (which now also becomes an integral).

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
answered Sep 27, 2017 by Motion Mountain [ no revision ]

As PhysicsOverflow is for graduate-level discussion, this does not fit our scope. 

+ 0 like - 0 dislike


I have a question on SE that only received one answer that, albeit interesting, isn't as technical as I was looking for. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/591439/what-theory-is-a-non-field-theory . 

Also, I think I read about "importing user profiles" too. Is that a thing?

answered Nov 9, 2020 by cu2mauro (35 points) [ revision history ]
edited Nov 9, 2020 by Dilaton
+ 0 like - 1 dislike
answered Aug 8, 2014 by GigiButbaia (0 points) [ no revision ]

They are all below graduate-level.

The only potentially grad-level post is 


depending what answer it will get here, the existing answers are all on standard undergrad-textbook level. I'd like to know if there are experimental methods beyond the textbook method, and what are the merits. 

I agree with @JiaYiyang. The how-to-produce-entanglement  question could maybe be seen as on-topic, if taken as an experimental question (?).

+ 0 like - 1 dislike

There are some questions posted by this user on Physics.SE. If they are ok for Physicsoverflow then please import them. I am afraid that some of his questions might get deleted soon there, so I've saved them at archive.org and can be seen in the following links even if they get deleted on Phys.Se,

I've no problem if these question are off-topic on PhysicsOverflow, perhaps being not upto the level of this site.

P.S: Any edits are welcome.

answered Jan 11, 2015 by User31782 (15 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jan 12, 2015 by User31782
Unfortunately, none of the questions look graduate-level to me, but if the import suggestion gets enough consensus, I'll import it.

I agree with this assessment but was wondering, if we could import them to chat to save them? Or maybe we could have a chat subcategory chat/PhysicsUnderflow to back up not PO on-topic but worth of salvaging SE questions that could for example be used for a future PhysicsUnderflow?

@Dilaton I think Chat shouldn't be for completely off-topic stuff, only for non-question discussions, tangential discussions moved from other posts, and other open-ended discussions if the author wants them to be there.

I've no problem if the question are off topic here. This question is about general relativity, may be it is on topic here.

+ 0 like - 2 dislike
answered Feb 17, 2019 by Holger Fiedler (0 points) [ no revision ]

The question is already adequately answered on PSE. There is no point looking for additional answers here. PhysicsOverflow is for graduate-level discussion only.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights