• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,734 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Rotation of a string operator in a string-net liquid

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

I am reading a review article on topological order. On page 6 of Ref. 1, the author introduces a 360-degree rotation of the string. And, it is said that a straight string state (i.e. an equivalence class of states generated by a straight string) is different from the class generated by a 360-degree rotation. I am having trouble understanding this part. Take the $Z_2$-toric code on a square lattice as an example. A 360-degree rotation (taking the clockwise direction instead of counter-clockwise in Ref. 1) may be pictured as fig. 3.

enter image description here

However, I think the two configurations are identical. We can move the bead up through its string. The result is a straight string with a loop on it. We can deform this loop so that only the straight string remains.

Why then the two configurations are different? Could someone tell me where I am mistaken? Thanks!


I think there might be one reason why the two pictures are different because we cannot apply the allowed string-net rules to transform from one to the other (see this article for the rules for $Z_2$ toric code). The string operator, which creates excitations, is an additional structure in the string-net theory. However, I still don't understand why we cannot use rules for string operators to relate configurations?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2021-02-04 16:35 (UTC), posted by SE-user Waterfall
asked Jan 20, 2021 in Theoretical Physics by Waterfall (30 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights