Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

191 submissions , 151 unreviewed
4,796 questions , 1,987 unanswered
5,288 answers , 22,473 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
774 active unimported users
More ...

  Monopole problem: 't Hooft–Polyakov, Big Bang theory versus Cosmic inflation

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
179 views

I am not sure the validity of this claim from Wikipedia on 't Hooft–Polyakov_monopole

The "monopole problem" refers to the cosmological implications of grand unification theories (GUT). Since monopoles are generically produced in GUT during the cooling of the universe, and since they are expected to be quite massive, their existence threatens to overclose it [clarification needed]. This is considered a "problem" within the standard Big Bang theory. Cosmic inflation remedies the situation by diluting any primordial abundance of magnetic monopoles.

  1. If monopoles are massive, we may not detect monopoles -- I do not know what does it mean to say "their existence threatens to overclose it"? If we cannot detect monopoles due to monopoles are massive, then why there is a "monopole problem"? It may be that we can find monopoles only if we can reach the GUT scale?

  2. "the standard Big Bang theory. Cosmic inflation remedies the situation by diluting any primordial abundance of magnetic monopoles." What are the differences of standard Big Bang theory versus Cosmic inflation? Do the remedies of the two the same idea or no?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-30 15:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
asked Jul 15, 2020 in Astronomy by annie marie heart (1,205 points) [ no revision ]
Isn't the monopole problem is the puzzle of non-observation of GUT-predicted monopoles in the present Universe?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-30 15:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user SRS

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
  1. According to many GUTs, monopoles (and other possible topological defects like cosmic strings) are generally predicted to be abundantly created in the early universe. Often such objects are stable or very long-lived, so their predicted abundance contradicts our observations -- we don't see them, so even if monopoles exist, they must be very rare somehow (order of 1 per observable universe, something like that). Inflation solves the problem by diluting them to non-observable amounts (assuming inflation happened after monopoles are created, i.e. after the GUT symmetry breaking on the time scale).

  2. By Standard Big Bang cosmology (SBBC) non-inflationary cosmology is understood here (standard cosmology without inflation). Inflationary cosmology = inflation+SBBC. Any cosmological model must include SBBC, but there are models where inflation is replaced by alternatives. For example String Gas Cosmology, Bouncing Cosmology, etc. So in this sense SBBC is the necessary component for any theoretical cosmological model to have.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-30 15:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user Kosm
answered Jul 15, 2020 by Kosm (55 points) [ no revision ]
thanks - I voted up, any good refs are welcome <3

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-30 15:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$low
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...