Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

180 submissions , 140 unreviewed
4,598 questions , 1,850 unanswered
5,203 answers , 22,211 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
728 active unimported users
More ...

  Classical Yang-Mills equation of motion with both electric and magnetic sources?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
993 views

We know the classical Maxwell equation of motion (eom) with both electric and magnetic source can be written as:

(1) Explicit form

enter image description here or more schematically as:

(2) Differential form $$ d * F = * J_e $$ $$ dF =* J_m $$

My question is that do we have such classical Yang-Mills equation of motion with both electric and magnetic source in both

(1) Explicit form?

(2) Differential form? Naively, we may write $$ D * F = * J_e $$ $$ D F =* J_m $$ where $F= dA + A \wedge A$ and $D=d + [A, ]$ as the covariant derivative version of exterior derivative $d$.

But: To be aware that for example, the $SU(2)$ Yang-Mills and $SO(3)$ Yang-Mills theory may have distinct constraint on the magnetic monopole (or the t Hooft loop). It does not seem to me that $J_e$ or $J_m$ contain such information?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-09 09:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
asked May 20, 2019 in Theoretical Physics by annie marie heart (450 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Nov 9
Please clarify your question. Are you asking why the same equations can be written in such different forms?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-09 09:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user G. Smith
No. But I am interested in knowing both (1) Explicit form and (2) Differential form for YM with e and m source

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-09 09:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
OK, that makes it clearer. Thank you. Do you really want the Yang-Mills equations written in terms of $\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{B}$? They ate usually written in terms of $F^{\mu\nu}$.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-09 09:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user G. Smith
written as $E^a$ and $B^a$ are preferred. But you can convert to $F$ first

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-09 09:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...