• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,721 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Mass gap v.s. classical nonlinear Yang-Mills waves

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Why people said (Witten, p. 11),

"For Yang-Mills theory. the mass gap is the reason that we do not see classical nonlinear Yang-Mills waves. They are a good approximation only under inaccessible conditions"

  1. Above the energy / mass gap, should we still see the classical nonlinear Yang-Mills waves?

  2. In the spin system, for example, couldn't we still see the spin wave above the massive spin gap? Could it have linear dispersion or high order non-linear dispersion?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:41 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
asked Jun 18, 2017 in Theoretical Physics by annie marie heart (1,205 points) [ no revision ]
The mass gap exists in confined systems, and obviously in a confined system there are no classical waves since the particles cannot travel far enough to create them. Whether waves can exist in a quark-gluon plasma, where the system is deconfined, is an interesting question ...

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:41 (UTC), posted by SE-user John Rennie
Non-linear waves are perfectly legal solutions of the classical Yang-Mills equations (see here where the ongoing discussion between me and Terry Tao was finally settled). These could be used in principle as the ground state for a quantum theory. In such a case, instantons could play a relevant role. Such classical waves have a massive dispersion relation.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:41 (UTC), posted by SE-user Jon

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights