• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  What is more fundamental: Fock space or Hilbert space? And why?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

Consider the following state for some bosons represented in Fock space:


where $k_i$ is some distinguishing index. You may think of these as the two different wavevectors for photons.

Now, if we use the Hilbert space representation of each individual boson, the same normalized state is given by:

$\frac{|k_1,k_1,k_2\rangle+|k_1,k_2,k_1\rangle+|k_2,k_1,k_1\rangle}{\sqrt {3}}$

Is this correct? Are the two expressions above equivalent?

Now, consider that $k_2$ becomes equal to $k_1$.

This would give the state: 

$\frac{3}{\sqrt{3}} |k_1,k_1,k_1\rangle$

which is clearly not normalized. How is this possible? Does it mean Fock space is more fundamental? 
However, the Hilbert space picture appears more intuitive at first glance.

In any case, how do we make sense of the prefactor of $\sqrt{3}$ intuitively?

asked May 25, 2020 in Theoretical Physics by saurabh.s (0 points) [ no revision ]

The statement that your state \(\frac{|k_1,k_1,k_2\rangle+|k_1,k_2,k_1\rangle+|k_2,k_1,k_1\rangle}{\sqrt {3}}\) is normalized is based on \(\langle k_1|k_2\rangle = 0\), which means you can't set \(k_1 = k_2\).

I was wondering what happens in the context of photon addition. There we have a photon in one mode that gets transferred to/added to another mode. 

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights