# Lax pair of an integrable non-linear PDE

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
307 views

The following is a fourth-order non-linear PDE that passes the Painleve integrability test

$$\left(1+x^{2}\right)^{2}u_{xxxx} + 8x\left(1+x^{2}\right)u_{xxx} + 4\left(1+3x^{2}\right)u_{xx}$$

$$+ t\left(2xuu_{xx}+ \left(1+x^{2}\right)\left(uu_{xx}\right)_{x} - 4\left(1+3x^{2}\right)u_{xxt} - 4x\left(1+x^{2}\right)u_{xxxt}\right)=0,$$

where $u=u(x,t)$. The leading-order behaviour of this PDE is of the form $u\approx\left(x-x_{0}\right)^{-1}$.  I am looking for a Lax pair $[\mathcal{L},\mathcal{M}]$ which satisfies the equation
$$\dot{\mathcal{L}}=[\mathcal{L},\mathcal{M}],$$

but not able to find the same. I suspect that this may be due to the fact that although few systems may pass the Painleve test, they need not be integrable. Any help is appreciated.

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$lowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.