• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,734 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  On Closed-form Solutions to the Fourth-Order Non-Linear Momentum Equation

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

I am presently working on a problem in fluid dynamics where our group is investigating the behavior of temperature, velocity, and pressure at the leading edge of a flat plate when fluid flows past it. The momentum equation, after introducing stream functions and cross-differentiation, reads
$$\rho\left(\psi_{y}\nabla^{2}\psi_{x} - \psi_{x}\nabla^{2}\psi_{y} \right) = \mu\nabla^{4}\psi$$

I have made use of the self-similar transformation $\eta=\frac{y}{x}$ with $f(\eta,R)=\frac{\psi}{Ux}$ to obtain the momentum equation as the following PDE (It checks out with paper [1] which I have referred (pg 156); note: there is one error in the paper, it has $2\eta ff_{\eta}$ instead of $2\eta ff_{\eta\eta}$ in the $R[...]$ terms)


$$+\left[2\eta ff_{\eta\eta}+(1+\eta^{2})(ff_{\eta\eta}+f_{\eta}f_{\eta\eta})- 4(1+3\eta^{2})f_{\eta\eta R}-4\eta(1+\eta^{2})f_{\eta\eta\eta R}\right]R$$

$$+\left[2\eta(f_{R}f_{\eta\eta}-ff_{\eta\eta R})-(1+\eta^{2})(f_{\eta}f_{\eta\eta R}-f_{R}f_{\eta\eta\eta})+2(1+3\eta^{2})f_{\eta\eta RR}\right]R^{2}$$

$$+\left[2\eta(f_{\eta}f_{\eta RR}-f_{R}f_{\eta \eta R})+ff_{\eta RR}-3f_{\eta}f_{RR}+4f_{RRR}-4\eta f_{\eta RRR}\right]R^{3}$$

$$+\left[f_{RRRR}+f_{R}f_{\eta RR}-f_{\eta}f_{RRR}\right]R^{4}=0$$

Boundary conditions: At the plate, $\eta=0$ and we have $f_{\eta}=0$ & $f+f_{R}R=0$. At the leading edge, $\eta \rightarrow \infty$ and we have $f_{\eta}\rightarrow 1$ & $f+f_{R}R\rightarrow \eta$. 

Since this problem is at the leading edge, we consider Reynolds numbers of the order $10^{-3}$ and hence, we can neglect all $\mathcal{O}(R^{2})$ and higher order terms of the PDE, but still, solving the resulting PDE is daunting. However, does a closed-form solution exist for the entire PDE?

The paper uses an asymptotic expansion in $R$ and setting $u=f_{\eta\eta}$, we obtain the following second-order ODE
$$(1+η^2 )^2 u_{ηη}+8η(1+η^2 )u_{η}+4(1+3η^2 )u=0, $$
to solve the PDE but I require a solution in $\eta$ and $R$ since I need to use it in finding the heat transfer coefficient via the energy equation. Just to give some context, the energy equation under a self-similar transformation reads

$$R^{2} \left(T_{RR}-PrU\left(f_{\eta}f_{\eta R}-f_{R}f_{\eta\eta} \right) \right)+R\left(PrU-4\eta T_{\eta} \right) +2\eta T_{\eta} + \left(1+\eta^{2} \right)T_{\eta\eta}=0,$$

where $Pr$ is the Prandtl number and $T=T(\eta,R)$. Setting $Pr\equiv1$, we can now define a second-order operator $L$ as follows

$$L:= \frac{1}{R^{2}}\left(1+\eta^{2}\right)\partial_{\eta\eta}^{2}+2\eta \left(1-2R \right)\partial_{\eta},$$

such that

$$L[T]+T_{RR}=H\ \ in\ V_{R},$$

where $H=-U(f_{\eta}f_{\eta R}-f_{R}f_{\eta\eta})$. Thus, with boundary conditions, we define the following IBVP

$$L[T]+T_{RR}=H\ \ in\ V_{R}$$

$$T=T_{\infty}\ \ on\ \partial V\times [0,R]$$

$$T=h,\ T_{R}=g\ \ on\ V\times\{R=0\} $$

where $V$ is an open set of $\Bbb{R}^{2}$, $V_{R}=V\times (0,R]$ for a fixed Reynold’s number $R>0$, $H:V_{R}\rightarrow \Bbb{R}$ and $h,g:V\rightarrow \Bbb{R}$ are given and $T:\bar{V}_{R}\rightarrow \Bbb{R}$ is unknown. Solving this PDE gives $T(\eta,R)$ and later gives $h(x)$ in terms of $f_{\eta},f_{\eta R},f_{R},f_{\eta \eta}$. I did try to solve the momentum PDE neglecting the terms of $R^{2}$ and higher powers and later trying to compare it to a standard form mentioned in Polyanin, but couldn't find a solution.

[1]: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1087/

asked Jun 23, 2019 in Mathematics by Naveen (85 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jul 1, 2019 by Naveen

Highly improbable that you will find a closed form solution, you should try numerical schemes.

I mean you can obviously check special functions handbooks available online and see if there's something similiar to your pde.


@MathematicalPhysicist I did solve it numerically but I require some sort of an approximate solution in the independent variables (at least up to order $\mathcal{O}(R)$) so that I can find the heat-transfer coefficient as mentioned in the question and I did check up some handbooks available online but could not find any PDE similar to mine.  

In that case, I would look at a series solution i.e. $f(\eta , R) = \sum_{m,n} a_n(\eta)b_m(R)$, where $b_m(R) = \sum_k c_{m,k}\cdot R^k$ and $a_n(\eta)=\sum_j d_{n,j} \eta^j$, where $c_{m,k}$ and $d_{n,j}$ are some coefficients.


@MathematicalPhysicist I went with the series method and used Mathlab's algebraic solver to solve the series multiplication until reaching the $p=n+m=4$ power degree, and it's taking forever to solve. Moreover, it's immensely complicated. Is there any other method to approach this problem?

Not that I am aware of, perhaps there's some symmetry here that I don't see, sorry.

There are some books that deal with symmetry groups and their uses in PDE and ODE, but I haven't yet read any of them.

I can recommend the books that I purchased and are in my shelf that you can try to consult:

Olver's "Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations".

Bluman's "Applications of Symmetry Methods to PDEs".

Maybe the answer lies there.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights