• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,075 questions , 2,226 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,743 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Why is "incorrect" parametrize a Timelike world-line using the time "t" of some frame S?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

In some relativity books ( Carrol, Schutz, Rindler) is common to treat the worldline of a massive particle as a parametric curve $x^\mu (\lambda)\ $ of spacetime, with $\lambda$ being a real parameter. In these books, the usual parameter used is the proper time $\ \tau \ $ of the particle. Why is unusual to parametrize the worldline of a particle with respect the time parameter $t$ of some inertial frame S (wich could not be the rest frame of the particle)? If using the "t" as parameter leads to an inconsistence or a algebraic/conceptual problem, please explain to me with some example, etc

asked Feb 6, 2020 in Theoretical Physics by Lil' Gravity (0 points) [ no revision ]
recategorized Feb 7, 2020 by Dilaton

1 Answer

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

It is conceivable to parametrise the worldline of a particle with the time t of some inertial (or non-inertial) frame B. After all, an observer at rest in B can observe the particle and record its position as a function of time t, thus providing the parametrisation.

However, if you consider a general situation, what frame B would you use? It would be an arbitrary, artificial choice, of "some" frame B that has nothing to do with the problem. Choosing the time in the rest frame of the particle (i.e. the proper time of the particle), which rest frame need not be inertial, is more natural. The rest frame of the particle is "there", because the particle is. The frame does not need to be introduced artificially, as above frame B would have to.

Furthermore, when it comes to derivatives, the derivative of the worldline with respect to the proper time is the 4-velocity of the particle, and a 4-vector. If you consider instead the derivative with respect to the time t of some frame B, then as long as the frame is fixed, the derivative is also a 4-vector (all observers, in all frames, agree with respect to the time that passes in frame B, although the time in their own respective frames is different). From the notation, however, this would be less evident, possibly more awkward, and definitely more error prone.

answered Feb 6, 2020 by anonymous [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights