• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,726 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  The Family Formula for Leptons and Quarks

+ 0 - 0
+ 0 - 0
Referee this paper: hal-01967522 by Nikola Perkovic

Please use comments to point to previous work in this direction, and reviews to referee the accuracy of the paper. Feel free to edit this submission to summarise the paper (just click on edit, your summary will then appear under the horizontal line)

(Is this your paper?)

requested Aug 21, 2019 by Dilaton (6240 points)
submission not yet summarized

paper authored Dec 30, 2018 to hep-ph by NikolaPerk
  • [ no revision ]

    1 Review

    + 2 like - 0 dislike

    Some initial comments on this paper... It starts by observing that in the standard model, yukawa couplings are free parameters. Then it goes on to propose formulas for the yukawas of the charged leptons, down-type quarks, and neutrinos.

    The yukawa formulas - the prototype of which is equation 8 - are not explained by any physical model, principle, or reasoning that I can see. Until such an explanation is provided, I can only regard them as an exercise in "numerology", i.e. algebraic formulas which, even if they are true for a physical reason and not just by coincidence, ultimately need to be embedded in a physical theory.

    The formulas contain a dependency on the fine-structure constant, which is common enough in physics numerology. However, they are unusual (even unique?) in that they employ the running fine-structure constant. Furthermore, the scale employed, is set by the mass of the relevant particle. For example, in equation 13, we see that the muon yukawa depends on the value of the fine-structure constant at the muon mass scale.

    This may sound circular; but it also resembles some authentic QFT calculations, in which the value of a quantity is obtained from the constraint of self-consistency. However, as I already said, I don't see how to interpret these formulas as part of a larger coherent theoretical framework, whether that's quantum field theory or something else. In other words, I don't know how to start from a specific quantum field theory, whether defined by a largangian or by some ansatz, and obtain these expressions from it. So it looks like numerology to me; but perhaps the author has explained his theoretical framework in other works.

    reviewed Aug 26, 2019 by Mitchell Porter (1,950 points) [ no revision ]

    Indeed, it would be interesting to give more details on the (8) construction. However, it is not ad hoc. The author provides the way to get it after a few assumptions. Similar papers ( in the form ) are common from great signatures. More than numerology, it is expressionology that can give ideas to other physicists. Unfortunately, the document covers a heavy domain and requires a lot of time for an useful review.

    Your Review:

    Please use reviews only to (at least partly) review submissions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
    To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
    Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
    This is the review box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
    Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
    Your name to display (optional):
    Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
    Anti-spam verification:
    If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
    Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
    Please complete the anti-spam verification

    user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

    Your rights