Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

171 submissions , 136 unreviewed
4,258 questions , 1,606 unanswered
5,064 answers , 21,510 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
614 active unimported users
More ...

  Exact solution for non-linear Fokker-Planck equation with 2 variables

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
84 views

I'm searching for exact (analytical) results for FP equation in 2 variables (such as $x$ and $p$ in 1D) with a steady state. Kramer's like (with force due to confining potential, such as harmonic potential) but with any nonlinear dissipation term (*or piece-wise linear*, however not $F(p) = -\gamma p$ for all $x$ and $p$). I don't need the time dependent part, only the steady state / asymptotic solution that satisfies the $L_{FP}W(x,p)=0$. For example, the following Langevin equations  

$$\dot x = \omega p$$
$$\dot p = F(p)-\omega x+\sqrt{2D_p}\xi(t)$$
are equivalent to the following Fokker-Planck equation  

$$[\omega(-p\partial_x+x\partial_p)+\partial_p(-F(p)+D_p\partial_p)]W(x,p)=\partial_tW(x,p)=0.$$

Notice that arbitrary choice of $F(p)$  and appropriate setting $D_p=-F(p)/p$ will satisfy the Fokker Planck equation above, as a consequence of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. In my request I search preferably for a solution with $D=\text{const}$, thus as a consequence, inconsistent with the fluctuation dissipation - non-thermal distribution (not Boltzmann-Gibbs, also not abeying detailed balance, since fluctuation dissipation derived by assumption of detailed balance).
Any other solution which is not consistent with the fluctuation dissipation* is good as well.

* Without going into details, I've seen few papers that try to generalize the fluctuation-dissipation to non-thermal states. For my porpuses I need just inconsistensy with the "regular" one, illustated by Einstein's relation $D_p=\gamma m k_B T$ or $\frac{D_p p}{F(p)}\sim \text{const}$. Any solution that doesn't obey this relation will suffice.

EDIT:
I've discussed briefly the topic with a professor who noted that few people did some work in the past about $F(p)=-\gamma p^3$ force, and threw the name of Haye Hinrichsen. I did a brief overview of few of his papers, however didn't find anything. Maybe I missed it, and reference to a proper solution will be good as well.

Second best solution is series solution in the form of $W(x,p)=\sum_{i,j}^\infty a_{i,j} x^i p^j$ with closed formula for $a_{i,j}$ coefficients.

asked Dec 11, 2018 in Resources and References by anonymous [ revision history ]
edited Dec 15, 2018

perhaps you would be interested by Arend Scheurkogel, Isaac Elishakoff : An Exact Solution of the Fokker-Planck Equation for Nonlinear Random Vibration of a Two-Degree-of-Freedom System ( under some conditions )

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...