• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

204 submissions , 162 unreviewed
5,026 questions , 2,180 unanswered
5,344 answers , 22,683 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
815 active unimported users
More ...

  Random matrices whose limit gives exact Wigner surmise

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

Let $M$ come from an ensemble of $N\times N$ matrices. The Wigner surmise is density function $p^W_0(s)=\frac{\pi}{2}se^{-\pi s^2/4}$. From a random matrix point of view, we can write $\rho^W_0(s)=\frac{d^2}{ds^2}E((0,s))$, where $E(I)$ is the eigenvalue gap probability: $M$ has no eigenvalues in interval $I$. $E(I)$ and it's derivatives are intimately related to the correlations between nearest neighbors.

Question 1: What are known random matrix ensembles which have their eigenvalue gap probability (in limit) exactly equal to the Wigner surmise? To be specific: either all $N\times N$ matrices have Wigner surmise OR the limiting eigenvalue distribution is exactly Wigner surmise.

Question 2: What are known interacting-particle systems which have their particle gap probability (in limit) exactly equal to the Wigner surmise?To be specific: either all $N\times N$ particle systems exhibit Wigner surmise OR the limiting particle distribution is exactly Wigner surmise.

One example that I've seen is the real Ginibre ensemble which takes a random Gaussian matrix and focuses only on real eigenvalues. Then the probability of there being an even number of eigenvalues in $[0,s]$ matches the Wigner surmise. This is equivalent to certain statistics of creation/annihilation processes on the line. In addition to this, there are some statistical physics spin systems which seem to give an exact surmise as well. Unfortunately I'm not an expert in the latter area.

Some more background:

It's a well known fact that many random matrix ensembles exhibit a (limiting) density function of the form:

$$p_0(s)=\frac{2u(\pi^2 s^2/4)}{s}\exp\left(-\int_0^{\pi^2 s^2/4}\frac{u(t)}{t}dt\right),$$

where $u$ satisfies a Painleve equation and of which $\rho_0^W(s)$ is a special case. So in short, $\rho^W_0(s)$ is usually an approximation, not an exact answer. One can certainly derive some conditions on $u$ and the resulting Painleve equation to get an exact Wigner surmise but this doesn't answer from which random matrix ensembles it comes from.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-03-12 12:24 (UTC), posted by SE-user Alex R.
asked Oct 3, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Alex R. (20 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Mar 12, 2015
one answer to question 1 is the Gaussian ensemble of 2x2 matrices; this is how Wigner arrived at his surmise...

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-03-12 12:25 (UTC), posted by SE-user Carlo Beenakker
@CarloBeenakker: That's cute! I completely forgot about that example. I've added emphasis that the matrices don't need to have exact Wigner surmise, but their limiting distribution should be exact.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-03-12 12:25 (UTC), posted by SE-user Alex R.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights