Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  On the interpretation of general theory of relativity

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
946 views

GTR only redirects the question of why an apple falls, replacing it with a much deeper, perhaps even metaphysical question; why does matter bend spacetime?

Although there have been many direct and non direct confirmations of the theory, how bluntly should we really interpret it's assertions considering also all the the other questions it brings up;

( 85 percent of matter in the universe remaining hypothetical,almost all matter and energy completely undanstood. )

Also is it right to say that to a distant observer an apple and the Earth have no spatial velocity, only their worldlines meet due only to the movement in time directions in curved spacetime, so the neither the apple nor the earth actually move an inch through space, only through the time direction?

asked Nov 24, 2018 in Chat by anonymous [ revision history ]
recategorized Nov 25, 2018 by Dilaton

1 Answer

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

I believe that the reason for matter bending spactime it's not metaphysical at all. It is suggested, or rather demanded by, the equivalence principle and special relativity. So Einstein did not just pull it out of thin air, he had good physical reason to understand gravity in that way.

answered Nov 25, 2018 by facenian [ no revision ]

Equivalence principle or not its just a slight improvement and a fancy way of expressing 500 year old classical physics. EQ principle doesn't apply consistently to QM, and there have been no deep, fundamental indications as to why EQ or space time curvature should be of any real meaning..

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$Overflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...