• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,719 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Do we have to depend on a tensor analysis (based on scalar components) in general relativity because suggesting geometrical meaning to vectors is difficult?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

The Schwarzschild metric represents a four dimensional curved space metric. This metric can be mathematically compared to the metric for surface of a sphere in the three dimensional flat space, where we can write an incremental displacement vector at a point but cannot write a position vector linking two points on the surface. Even though, in the four-dimensional curved space, it is difficult to write a position vector, we can write an incremental displacement vector based on the four dimensional metric. This incremental vector based classical approach will give exactly same results as the tensor analysis in the classical general relativity. But, we face some geometrical difficulties. The main difficulties are:

  • It is difficult to write unit vector expressions and draw a geometrical picture of the global or even a local coordinate system.
  • The general incremental vector dA is not always path independent but incremental displacement vector ds is always path independent, in the same curved space. The two incremental vectors behave differently in the same space.

In general relativity, the fourth dimension is defined as time and each point in the four-dimensional space-time has to be associated with an event. Therefore, the conventional definition of vector itself requires a change in a curved space-time (C. W Misner, K.  S. Thorne, J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation. W. H. Freeman and Company. San Francisco (1973)). The temptation to regard vectors as arrows linking two events itself has to be discarded. The bilocal (point for head and point for tail) version of a vector has to be replaced by a purely local version. Also, the vectors cannot be physically moved around and each vector has to be attached to a specific local event. There is no position vector on a manifold. Points can only be labelled by their coordinates and are not vectors. But, even this definition also raises some concerns. The following preprint on Research Gate lists the concerns with both the bilocal and local versions of the vectors:

Preprint Vector analysis in the curved space-time: The problems, the ...

The analysis dealing with  relations between various scalar components of a tensor can bypass these geometrical difficulties. Even though, a vector analysis can give all the desired mathematical results, it has to be avoided as it lacks geometrical support.  

asked Jan 17, 2022 in Theoretical Physics by anonymous [ revision history ]
edited Jan 21, 2022

I have put the abstract together with the link to the paper into your submission here


so maybe this post is no longer needed?

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights