• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,075 questions , 2,226 unanswered
5,348 answers , 22,757 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Does ER = EPR imply the absence of naked singularity?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

Two independent observers observe 2 entangled black holes. Assuming ER = EPR is true and both black holes have naked singularities then they can contact with each other in doing experiment naturally. It seems to be a contradiction because no communication theorem does not allow them to be contact while doing experiment. The flow of information flows from each of them to the other ( because ER = EPR ) and can be seen by both of them because naked singularity. Am i wrong?

asked Jan 12, 2018 in Chat by One Eyed King (-30 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Jan 12, 2018 by Arnold Neumaier

What does ER and EPR mean?

It means entangled particles were connect through a wormhole. ER used for denotes a wormhole ( Einstein Rosen bridge ) and EPR for quantum entanglement ( Einstein Podolsky Rosen- for their paper in 1935 ). Leonard Susskind , father of string theory proposed this to explain quantum entanglement and to unify both general relativity and quantum mechanics. You can search on Wikipedia and some papers on arxiv.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights