• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,075 questions , 2,226 unanswered
5,348 answers , 22,744 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  A typo in equations (2.6) and (4.68) of "Proof of Character-Valued Index Theorems" by Mark W. Goodman

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

In the article "Proof of Character-Valued Index Theorems" by Mark  W.  Goodman (https://projecteuclid.org/download/pdf_1/euclid.cmp/1104116140); on page  407 appears the equation (4.68) with the form

My claim is that there is a typo in the equation (4.68) and then the correct form must be

Do you agree?

Other typo:  on page  393  appears the equation (2.6) with the form

There is a typo in the equation (2.6) and then the correct form must be

It is corroborated by the equation (4.67) which reads as

asked Sep 15, 2017 in Mathematics by juancho (1,130 points) [ revision history ]
edited Sep 18, 2017 by juancho

yes, as stated in 2.10 for the Lefschetz number ... but I have still to check why 4.67 + 2.6 => 4.68

Hi @igael, thanks for your comment.  You are right (2.10) shows that there is a typo in (4.68). I do not understand what do you mean with "4.67 + 2.6 => 4.68".  The equation (4.67)  is precisely the equation (4,61) but restated in the language of forms. Similarly, the equation (4..68) is precisely the equation (4.62) but restated in the language of forms.  Then according with these facts it is nor possible to derive (4.68) from (4.67) and (2.6).  Do you agree?  All the best.

Hi :) sorry, not well awake the last night. I did a bad substitution

2 Answers

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

A possible derivation of (4.68) is as follows.

Then we have that

$$(-1)^{F}|\omega_p>= (-1)^{p}|\omega_p>$$

$$<\omega_p|(-1)^F = (-1)^p<\omega_p|$$

$$H|\omega_p> = E_p|\omega_p>$$

$${e}^{-\beta\,H}|\omega_p>={e}^{-\beta E_{p}}|\omega_p> $$

with all these facts we make the following computation:

$$Tr((-1)^F b{e}^{-\beta\,H})=\sum _ p  <\omega_p| (-1)^F b{e}^{-\beta\,H}|\omega_p> =\sum _ p  (-1)^p<\omega_p|  b|\omega_p>{e}^{-\beta\,E_p} , $$

$$Tr((-1)^F b{e}^{-\beta\,H})=\sum _ p  (-1)^p<\omega_p|  b|\omega_p>{e}^{-\beta\,E_p}|_{E_p=0} =\sum _ p  (-1)^p<\omega_p|  b|\omega_p>,$$

$$Tr((-1)^F b{e}^{-\beta\,H})=\sum _ p  (-1)^pTr_{H^p}(b) =\sum _ p  (-1)^p \chi_{{p}} \left( b \right) = \chi \left( M_{{b}} \right) .$$

answered Sep 17, 2017 by juancho (1,130 points) [ no revision ]
+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Other derivation of (4.68) which could be useful in quantum computing is as follows.

Let $H^p$ the Hilbert space with orthonormal basis $\left\{ |\omega_p> \right\} $.  We define a unitary transformation

$$ U :  H^p \rightarrow H^p$$

by the formula·

$$ U = (-1)^F b {e}^{-\beta\,H} $$


$$ U |\omega_p>= (-1)^p  {e}^{-\beta\,E_p} b |\omega_p> $$

Let a quantum state given by

$$|\Psi>= \sum _p|\omega_p>.$$

Will all these ingredients we make the following computation.

$$Tr((-1)^F b {e}^{-\beta\,H} ) = Tr(U)= < \Psi |U|\Psi>= \sum _q\sum _p<\omega_q|U|\omega_p>,$$

$$Tr((-1)^F b {e}^{-\beta\,H} ) = Tr(U)= < \Psi |U|\Psi>=\sum _q\sum _p<\omega_q|(-1)^p  {e}^{-\beta\,E_p} b |\omega_p>,$$

$$Tr((-1)^F b {e}^{-\beta\,H} ) = Tr(U)= < \Psi |U|\Psi>=\sum _q\sum _p(-1)^p  {e}^{-\beta\,E_p} <\omega_q|b |\omega_p>,$$

$$Tr((-1)^F b {e}^{-\beta\,H} ) = Tr(U)= < \Psi |U|\Psi>=\sum _q\sum _p(-1)^p  {e}^{-\beta\,E_p} <\omega_p|b |\omega_p>\delta_{{q,p}},$$

$$Tr((-1)^F b {e}^{-\beta\,H} ) = Tr(U)= < \Psi |U|\Psi>=\sum _p(-1)^p  {e}^{-\beta\,E_p} <\omega_p|b |\omega_p>,$$

$$Tr((-1)^F b {e}^{-\beta\,H} ) = Tr(U)= < \Psi |U|\Psi>= \sum _p(-1)^p \chi_{{p}} \left( b \right) = \chi \left( M_{{b}} \right) .$$

Reference :  Louis Kauffman, arXiv:1001.0354v3  [math.GT]  31 Jan 2010 Topological Quantum Information, Khovanov Homology and the Jones Polynomial  (http://lanl.arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0354)

answered Sep 18, 2017 by juancho (1,130 points) [ revision history ]
edited Sep 18, 2017 by juancho

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights