Questions on the paper "Theory of Spin Glasses" by Edwards and Anderson

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
324 views

I have two questions related to the paper "Theory of Spin Glasses" by Edwards and Anderson. It can be found at http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0305-4608/5/5/017/pdf for those who may want to read the paper.

1. In explaining equation (2.23), $q^2 = 5 \left[ 1 - \left(\frac{T}{T_c}\right)^2 \right] \left( \frac{T}{T_c} \right)^4$ the authors say
"The structure is similar to the Standard Curie-Weiss theory, with the proviso that, at $T\rightarrow 0$, $q \rightarrow +1$ and not $-1$, whereas either root is permitted in ferromagnetism."

However, in (2.23) $q \rightarrow 0$ as $T \rightarrow 0$. On top of this $q = 1$ is not even a solution, and the case that $q = -1$ is not entirely ruled out. I was unable to reproduce their equation given their variables -- I think there may be a typo in their definition of $\rho$ -- but even with the fixed-up expression, I get roughly the same dependence on $T$ as they do.

2.  Edwards and Anderson define an order parameter $q = \langle \mathbf{s}_i^{(1)} \cdot \mathbf{s}_i^{(2)} \rangle$. For those unfamiliar with the idea, this is an average of the $i$th spin $\mathbf{s}_i^{(1)} \equiv \mathbf{s}_i(t_1)$ at time $t_1$ dotted with itself at a later time $t_2$. The intuition is that the spins in spin glasses change slowly with time. The authors say that the probability of finding spin $i$ in the state $\mathbf{s}_i^{(1)}$ is given by $p(\mathbf{s}_i^{(1)}) = \frac{1}{Z}e^{-\beta E(\mathbf{s}_i^{(1)} )}.$ They follow this up by saying that the probability of finding $\mathbf{s}_i^{(1)}$ at one time and $\mathbf{s}_i^{(2)}$ at some later time is $$P(\mathbf{s}_i^{(1)},\mathbf{s}_i^{(2)}) = p(\mathbf{s}_i^{(1)})p(\mathbf{s}_i^{(2)}),$$ (see equation (2.2)) which suggests the probabilities are independent. But if $\mathbf{s}_i^{(1)}$ and $\mathbf{s}_i^{(2)}$ are correlated, the probability of observing $\mathbf{s}_i^{(2)}$ depends on the value of $\mathbf{s}_i^{(1)}$.

Please let me know of any resources which may explain the shortcomings in this paper. It seems that there may be several mistakes in the manuscript, but for some reason or another I cannot find any mention of this. Thanks for any help.

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.